PIP Medical Reimbursement Dispute
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled that PIP insurers must reimburse medical providers for services without established fee schedule amounts (Code S9088) if a methodology for determining reimbursement exists, affirming lower court decisions in Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois v. MD Now Medical Centers, Inc. and related cases.
Additional Notes
Decision is a winner for medical providers who had services denied because the code billed did not have an established reimbursement amount under Medicare or Florida Workers’ Compensation.