DUI
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Mr. Kunka recently had a client found not guilty of a Driving Under the Influence after a bench trial in Howard County Circuit Court. In this case, the officer testified that the client was acting belligerent and had an attitude. Mr. Kunka’s client was adamant that he was not impaired and that it was, in fact, the officer who was acting belligerent. During the cross-examination of the arresting officer, Mr. Kunka was able to frustrate the arresting officer to the point that the officer lashed out in court. It was pretty clear after the trial that the version of events testified to by Mr. Kunka’s client were the true version of events. The Judge found Mr. Kunka’s client Not Guilty.
Additional Notes
Bench trial in Howard County Circuit Court. Officer's testimony contradicted by client; officer became belligerent during cross-examination. Judge found client Not Guilty.