Assault of Police Officer
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
In Baltimore County Circuit Court Mr. Kunka’s client was accused of purposely driving over a police officer’s foot. Client was charged with assault. Mr. Kunka was able to obtain the officer’s Body Worn Camera. It was clear once he viewed the video that his client was not guilty of the offense and that the officer made up his version of events. The State refused to drop the case because the officer swore that his version of events was correct. Mr. Kunka tried the case by bench trial in circuit court. Mr. Kunka stipulated to the officer’s report and asked the judge to watch the best evidence...the video. After reviewing the video, the Judge agreed with Mr. Kunka that the officer’s testimony was not the truth. The client was found Not Guilty. This client is an armed security guard, any conviction for assault on a police officer would have cost him his job immediately.
Additional Notes
Bench trial in Baltimore County Circuit Court. Client accused of driving over officer's foot. Body Worn Camera footage proved client not guilty and officer's account false. Judge found client Not Guilty, saving his job as an armed security guard.