$290,000
Auto Accident
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
This case involved a wreck with an uninsured driver who failed to appear for his district court criminal case on drunk driving charges. The claim against the drunk driver was filed under the uninsured coverage of the plaintiff’s policy. Woody requested that the city of Wilmington traffic control office provide photographic images obtained from the “red-light” cameras operated at the intersection to aid in showing the other driver’s car in the intersection. The information showed the length of time the light had been red, as well as the other driver’s excessive speed. Having such evidence assisted Woody in arguing for a higher compensatory claim, as the punitive claim was not covered under the applicable policy.
Additional Notes
Insurance recovery for injuries (permanent scars, shoulder injury) from intersection collision with uninsured drunk driver. Red-light camera evidence used.