$100,000
Contract Dispute
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Successfully defended a Montana corporation in a Uniform Commercial Code arbitration, arguing that the manufacturer’s boilerplate terms and conditions for attorney fees and costs did not apply to the contract.
Additional Notes
The arbitrator agreed that the standard terms were a 'material alteration' of the contract terms under U.C.C. 2-207(2)(b).