Case Result
$485,000
Insurance Coverage
2016
Minneapolis, MN
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled a bank was entitled to bond coverage for cyber theft of $485,000, despite employees' failure to follow security procedures, due to the bond's language and Minnesota's concurrent-cause doctrine.