Veterans Disability
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Supreme Court ruling in favor of combat-disabled veterans, establishing that the 6-year limit from the Barring Act does not apply to Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) back pay.
Additional Notes
The ruling in Soto v. United States means veterans should be paid back to when they first qualified for CRSC, potentially going back to 2008, and could result in thousands of dollars in backpay for affected veterans. The case was brought by Simon Soto, a Marine veteran medically retired with PTSD.