Foreclosure, Procedural Law
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Appellate court reversed a default judgment in a foreclosure action because the defendant was never properly served, highlighting the importance of confirming sufficiency of service.
Additional Notes
The bank eventually conceded the service was defective, and the court reversed.