Intellectual Property Dispute
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
In a Michigan intellectual property case, data visualization and expert witness testimony helped a tech company demonstrate that a competitor had infringed on their patents, leading to a favorable verdict.
Additional Notes
Favorable jury verdict in an intellectual property infringement case.