$3
Construction Law, Insurance Law
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Western District of Washington ruled that an impaired property exclusion applied to exclude coverage for damages related to improperly constructed retaining walls, as the failure was gradual and inevitable, not sudden and accidental. The parties had reached a settlement for $2.66 million, but coverage was denied.
Additional Notes
Settlement amount was $2.66 million, but coverage was denied by the court.