$200,000
Homeowners' Association Law
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Washington Supreme Court ruled against an HOA and in favor of a lot owner whose proposed home construction was rejected, awarding damages and attorney's fees.
Additional Notes
The Court ruled that discretionary decisions by HOAs must reflect 'good faith' and be 'reasonable'. The Board relied on inaccurate information and did not conduct an adequate investigation. Damages and attorney's fees were awarded against the Board Directors and HOA members personally.