Electronic Solicitation of a Minor
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Defendant unsuccessfully appealed a guilty conviction for electronic solicitation of a minor, arguing his autism affected his understanding of wrongfulness. The court affirmed the conviction.
Additional Notes
The court found the defendant was aware of the victim's age and the illegality of his actions, despite his mild autism diagnosis.