Our Attorneys
Notable Case Results
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Vehicle Accident Law
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company that vehicle insurance policy clauses requiring insureds to submit to independent medical examinations whenever the insurer wants are void, as they violate public policy and are 'repugnant' to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).
Vehicle Accident Law
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company that vehicle insurance policy clauses requiring insureds to submit to independent medical examinations whenever the insurer wants are void, as they violate public policy and are 'repugnant' to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).
Vehicle Accident Law
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company that vehicle insurance policy clauses requiring insureds to submit to independent medical examinations whenever the insurer wants are void, as they violate public policy and are 'repugnant' to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).
Vehicle Accident Law
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company that vehicle insurance policy clauses requiring insureds to submit to independent medical examinations whenever the insurer wants are void, as they violate public policy and are 'repugnant' to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).
Vehicle Accident Law
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company that vehicle insurance policy clauses requiring insureds to submit to independent medical examinations whenever the insurer wants are void, as they violate public policy and are 'repugnant' to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).
Vehicle Accident Law
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company that vehicle insurance policy clauses requiring insureds to submit to independent medical examinations whenever the insurer wants are void, as they violate public policy and are 'repugnant' to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).
Contact Information
Office Locations
415 Madison Road, Clarion, PA 16214
Clarion, PA 16214