Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

25 CRASHES IN
ACUSHNET, MA
JANUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstJanuary 2025

Total crashes in January increased by 56.25%, rising from 16 in the prior year to 25 in the current year. This period also saw a significant 133.33% increase in total injuries, from 3 to 7. The most notable year-over-year shift is the substantial increase in crashes occurring in 40 mph speed zones, which rose from 3 to 12.

25

56.3%was 16

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

7

133.3%was 3

Persons Injured

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Overall, crash activity in January showed a significant upward trend year-over-year, with total crashes increasing by 56.25% from 16 to 25. Concurrently, the number of injuries more than doubled, rising by 133.33% from 3 to 7. This indicates a notable escalation in both crash frequency and injury severity.

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes — January 2026

0.0% vs prior (1)

The number of hit-and-run crashes remained stable at 1 in both the current and prior periods. However, due to the overall increase in total crashes, the hit-and-run rate decreased from 6.3% in the prior period to 4% in the current period.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

7

Motorists Injured

Prior: 3133.3%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The temporal distribution of crashes shifted year-over-year, with the peak day moving from Saturday (3 crashes) in the prior period to Monday (7 crashes) in the current period. The peak crash hour also changed, from 1 PM (3 crashes) in the prior year to 10 PM (4 crashes) in the current year. Notably, crashes occurring during "Dark - roadway not lighted" conditions increased significantly from 1 to 8.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

While no fatalities were reported in either period, the total number of injuries increased by 133.33%, rising from 3 to 7. The distribution of injury severity also changed, with serious injuries (A) appearing in the current period with 1 crash, compared to 0 in the prior period. The proportion of crashes resulting in any injury slightly increased from 18.75% (3 out of 16) to 20% (5 out of 25).

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury1serious injury crashes4%
Minor Injury2minor injury crashes8%
0.0%prior 2
Possible Injury2possible injury crashes8%
100.0%prior 1
No Injury20no injury crashes80%
53.8%prior 13

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The leading contributing factor, "No improper driving," increased from 6 crashes (37.5% share) to 13 crashes (52% share), representing a 116.7% count increase. Factors such as "Glare" and "Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner" appeared in the current period with 2 crashes each, not being present in the prior period. Conversely, "Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings" (3 crashes) and "Failed to yield right of way" (2 crashes) were present in the prior period but not in the current.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving13 (52%)116.7%prior 6
Glare2 (8%)
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner2 (8%)
Distracted1 (4%)
Operating defective equipment1 (4%)
Made an improper turn1 (4%)
Driving too fast for conditions1 (4%)
Fatigued/asleep1 (4%)
Inattention1 (4%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring in "Snow" conditions increased significantly from 1 in the prior period to 5 in the current period, and "Ice" conditions also saw a rise from 1 to 5 crashes. "Dark - roadway not lighted" conditions experienced a substantial increase in crashes, going from 1 to 8. Conversely, crashes in "Daylight" conditions decreased from 12 to 10, despite an overall increase in total crashes.

Weather

Clear18 (72.0%)
50.0%prior 12
Snow5 (20.0%)
Clear/Other1 (4.0%)
Cloudy1 (4.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight10 (40.0%)
-16.7%prior 12
Dark - roadway not lighted8 (32.0%)
Dark - lighted roadway7 (28.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry9 (36.0%)
-30.8%prior 13
Ice5 (20.0%)
Snow5 (20.0%)
Slush3 (12.0%)
Wet3 (12.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

Top Vehicle Makes (35 vehicles)

1
FORD8 (22.9%)
2
GMC4 (11.4%)
3
KIA4 (11.4%)
4
CHEVROLET3 (8.6%)
-40.0%prior 5
5
JEEP3 (8.6%)
6
TOYOTA3 (8.6%)
7
HONDA2 (5.7%)
8
DODGE2 (5.7%)
9
OTHER1 (2.9%)
10
RAM1 (2.9%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Vehicle unit records

1 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (39 persons with recorded sex)

Male28 (71.8%)
100.0%prior 14
Female11 (28.2%)
-26.7%prior 15

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

There was a notable shift in crash distribution across speed zones, with crashes in 40 mph zones increasing from 3 in the prior period to 12 in the current period, a 300% count increase. Crashes in 25 mph zones also rose from 4 to 7. In contrast, crashes in 35 mph zones decreased from 4 to 1, and 15 mph zones, which had 2 crashes in the prior period, had none in the current period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31 (31 days)
  • Geographic scope: ACUSHNET, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 25
  • Total persons involved: 40
  • Total vehicles involved: 35

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "ACUSHNET, MA Crash Intelligence Report: January 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/acushnet/january-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Acushnet, MA Crash Report — January 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com