Yearly Traffic Safety Analysis

566 CRASHES IN
BURLINGTON, MA
2025

All metrics benchmarked against2024

In Burlington, total traffic crashes decreased by 10.4% from 632 in the prior year to 566 in the current year. This overall reduction was accompanied by a drop in total injuries from 193 to 160. The most notable year-over-year shift was the elimination of traffic fatalities, which fell from one in the prior period to zero in the current period.

566

-10.4%was 632

Total Crash Events

0

-100.0%was 1

Persons Killed

160

-17.1%was 193

Persons Injured

22

-8.3%was 24

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 12 crashes with unreported severity are not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Crash data for Burlington indicates a downward trend year-over-year. Total crashes fell by 10.4%, from 632 to 566. Similarly, the number of people injured in these incidents decreased by 17.1% from 193 to 160, and fatalities were reduced from one to zero.

22

Hit-and-Run Crashes — 2025

-8.3% vs prior (24)

The absolute number of hit-and-run incidents saw a minor decrease from 24 in the prior year to 22 in the current year. Despite this drop in count, the hit-and-run rate as a percentage of total crashes edged up slightly from 3.8% to 3.9%. This indicates that the proportion of hit-and-run crashes relative to all other crashes remained largely stable.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Pedestrians Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 1-100.0%

0

Other Killed

Prior: 00.0%

3

Pedestrians Injured

Prior: 250.0%

153

Motorists Injured

Prior: 190-19.5%

4

Other Injured

Prior: 0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The temporal patterns of crashes showed some changes between the two periods. The peak day for crashes shifted from Thursday (104 crashes) in the prior year to Monday (88 crashes) in the current year. However, the peak hour for collisions remained consistent at 5 p.m. in both periods, though the volume of crashes during that hour decreased from 63 to 53.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Crash severity improved year-over-year, with fatal crashes decreasing from one to zero. The count of serious injury crashes also saw a significant reduction, falling from 15 in the prior period to 6 in the current period. Overall, the proportion of crashes resulting in any level of injury (Serious, Minor, or Possible) declined from 24.4% to 22.2% of all incidents.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury6serious injury crashes1.1%
-60.0%prior 15
Minor Injury87minor injury crashes15.4%
-13.9%prior 101
Possible Injury32possible injury crashes5.7%
-15.8%prior 38
No Injury429no injury crashes75.8%
-7.9%prior 466

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The leading contributing factors to crashes showed some shifts in ranking. "Followed too closely" remained the top factor in both years, with a nearly identical count of 132 and 133, respectively. However, crashes attributed to "Failed to yield right of way" increased in count from 77 to 88, moving it from the third to the second most common factor. Conversely, crashes where "No improper driving" was cited decreased from 92 to 72.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

Followed too closely133 (23.5%)0.8%prior 132
Failed to yield right of way88 (15.5%)14.3%prior 77
No improper driving72 (12.7%)-21.7%prior 92
Inattention51 (9%)-7.3%prior 55
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road38 (6.7%)-5.0%prior 40
Driving too fast for conditions25 (4.4%)-13.8%prior 29
Other improper action23 (4.1%)9.5%prior 21
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings19 (3.4%)5.6%prior 18
Distracted13 (2.3%)0.0%prior 13
Made an improper turn11 (1.9%)-35.3%prior 17

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

While total crashes decreased, the number of incidents occurring on non-dry road surfaces (wet, ice, or snow) remained constant at 110 in both periods. This resulted in a proportional increase in adverse-surface crashes from 17.4% to 19.4% of the total. The share of crashes occurring in daylight conditions increased from 66.8% in the prior year to 70.8% in the current year.

Weather

Clear/Clear258 (46.2%)
186.7%prior 90
Clear163 (29.2%)
-55.9%prior 370
Cloudy26 (4.7%)
-51.9%prior 54
Cloudy/Cloudy18 (3.2%)
Rain18 (3.2%)
-47.1%prior 34
Rain/Rain15 (2.7%)
200.0%prior 5
Rain/Cloudy11 (2.0%)
0.0%prior 11
Clear/Cloudy10 (1.8%)
42.9%prior 7
Cloudy/Rain10 (1.8%)
-33.3%prior 15
Snow/Snow7 (1.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight401 (71.7%)
-5.0%prior 422
Dark - lighted roadway104 (18.6%)
-24.1%prior 137
Dark - roadway not lighted24 (4.3%)
0.0%prior 24
Dusk19 (3.4%)
-9.5%prior 21
Dawn7 (1.3%)
-58.8%prior 17
Dark - unknown roadway lighting3 (0.5%)
-40.0%prior 5
Other1 (0.2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry446 (79.8%)
-12.5%prior 510
Wet79 (14.1%)
-11.2%prior 89
Ice17 (3.0%)
240.0%prior 5
Snow14 (2.5%)
-12.5%prior 16
Slush1 (0.2%)
-80.0%prior 5
Other1 (0.2%)
Sand, mud, dirt, oil, gravel1 (0.2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The top three vehicle makes involved in crashes were consistent across both periods: Toyota, Honda, and Ford, though the number of vehicles for each make decreased. The 26-34 age group remained the most frequently involved demographic among all persons, but their count dropped from 303 to 244. This pattern of lower counts within consistent rankings was observed across most age groups.

Top Vehicle Makes (1,125 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA195 (17.3%)
-9.3%prior 215
2
HONDA174 (15.5%)
-9.4%prior 192
3
FORD111 (9.9%)
-3.5%prior 115
4
NISSAN65 (5.8%)
-3.0%prior 67
5
CHEVROLET52 (4.6%)
-38.1%prior 84
6
JEEP50 (4.4%)
-3.8%prior 52
7
SUBARU45 (4%)
-28.6%prior 63
8
KIA39 (3.5%)
116.7%prior 18
9
HYUNDAI35 (3.1%)
-12.5%prior 40
10
BMW30 (2.7%)
25.0%prior 24

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Vehicle unit records

72 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (1,245 persons with recorded sex)

Male702 (56.4%)
-8.1%prior 764
Female539 (43.3%)
-9.3%prior 594
X / Unspecified4 (0.3%)
300.0%prior 1

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes decreased across the most frequent speed zones year-over-year. Incidents in 55 mph zones fell from 207 to 148, and crashes in 35 mph zones dropped from 138 to 99. The single fatal crash recorded in the prior year was not repeated, resulting in zero fatalities in any speed zone during the current period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31 (365 days)
  • Geographic scope: BURLINGTON, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 566
  • Total persons involved: 1,330
  • Total vehicles involved: 1,125

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "BURLINGTON, MA Crash Intelligence Report: 2025." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/burlington/2025-annual-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Burlington, MA Crash Report — 2025 | ThatCarHitMe.com