Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

38 CRASHES IN
BURLINGTON, MA
FEBRUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstFebruary 2025

BURLINGTON experienced a notable decrease in total crashes, falling from 53 in February 2025 to 38 in February 2026, a 28.3% reduction. Despite fewer crashes overall, total injuries increased slightly from 14 to 16 persons. The most significant shift was the decrease in crashes occurring in 55 mph speed zones, dropping from 16 to 5.

38

-28.3%was 53

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

16

14.3%was 14

Persons Injured

0

-100.0%was 2

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 1 crash with unreported severity is not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

The overall trend indicates a significant decrease in crash incidents year-over-year, with total crashes falling by 28.3% from 53 in February 2025 to 38 in February 2026. This reduction suggests a positive trend in overall traffic safety for the period.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

16

Motorists Injured

Prior: 1323.1%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

Temporal patterns shifted notably between the two periods. The peak day for crashes moved from Wednesday in February 2025 (11 crashes) to Saturday in February 2026 (10 crashes). Similarly, the peak crash hour shifted from 8 AM (7 crashes) in the prior year to 1 PM (6 crashes) in the current year.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Fatal crashes remained at zero in both February 2025 and February 2026. Total injuries saw a slight increase from 14 in the prior period to 16 in the current period. The proportion of crashes resulting in any injury (Serious, Minor, or Possible) increased from 22.6% (12 out of 53) in February 2025 to 31.6% (12 out of 38) in February 2026.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury1serious injury crashes2.6%
0.0%prior 1
Minor Injury9minor injury crashes23.7%
-10.0%prior 10
Possible Injury2possible injury crashes5.3%
100.0%prior 1
No Injury25no injury crashes65.8%
-34.2%prior 38

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The leading contributing factors saw significant shifts; 'Followed too closely' crashes decreased from 12 to 6, a 50% reduction in count, dropping from the top factor in February 2025. Conversely, 'Failed to yield right of way' crashes increased from 5 to 9, an 80% increase in count, becoming the most frequent factor in February 2026. 'Inattention' crashes also decreased substantially from 6 to 1.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

Failed to yield right of way9 (23.7%)80.0%prior 5
No improper driving6 (15.8%)0.0%prior 6
Followed too closely6 (15.8%)-50.0%prior 12
Driving too fast for conditions4 (10.5%)
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings3 (7.9%)
Over-correcting/over-steering2 (5.3%)
Other improper action1 (2.6%)
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway1 (2.6%)
Exceeded authorized speed limit1 (2.6%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road1 (2.6%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring on dry road surfaces decreased from 35 in February 2025 to 19 in February 2026, while crashes on snowy surfaces slightly increased from 7 to 9. Daylight crashes decreased from 36 to 27, and crashes occurring in dark conditions (lighted, not lighted, unknown) decreased from 14 to 9. The number of crashes during clear weather conditions (Clear/Clear, Clear) decreased from 37 to 23.

Weather

Clear/Clear15 (40.5%)
-31.8%prior 22
Clear8 (21.6%)
-46.7%prior 15
Snow4 (10.8%)
Snow/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)3 (8.1%)
Cloudy/Cloudy3 (8.1%)
Snow/Blowing sand, snow2 (5.4%)
Snow/Snow1 (2.7%)
-80.0%prior 5
Cloudy1 (2.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight27 (73.0%)
-25.0%prior 36
Dark - lighted roadway8 (21.6%)
-20.0%prior 10
Dark - unknown roadway lighting1 (2.7%)
Dusk1 (2.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry19 (52.8%)
-45.7%prior 35
Snow9 (25.0%)
28.6%prior 7
Wet4 (11.1%)
-20.0%prior 5
Ice2 (5.6%)
-60.0%prior 5
Sand, mud, dirt, oil, gravel2 (5.6%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

Toyota remained the top vehicle make involved in crashes, though its count decreased from 18 to 14. Ford and Honda also saw decreases in involvement, from 13 to 8 and 10 to 9 respectively, while Chevrolet increased from 6 to 8. The age distribution of persons involved saw a significant increase in the 65+ age group, rising from 9 persons in February 2025 to 24 persons in February 2026.

Top Vehicle Makes (73 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA14 (19.2%)
-22.2%prior 18
2
HONDA9 (12.3%)
-10.0%prior 10
3
FORD8 (11%)
-38.5%prior 13
4
CHEVROLET8 (11%)
33.3%prior 6
5
MAZDA4 (5.5%)
6
HYUNDAI3 (4.1%)
-40.0%prior 5
7
NISSAN3 (4.1%)
-50.0%prior 6
8
VOLKSWAGEN3 (4.1%)
9
JEEP3 (4.1%)
10
MERCEDES-BENZ2 (2.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Vehicle unit records

4 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (92 persons with recorded sex)

Male50 (54.3%)
-9.1%prior 55
Female42 (45.7%)
-12.5%prior 48

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in 55 mph speed zones decreased significantly from 16 in February 2025 to 5 in February 2026. Conversely, crashes in 35 mph zones increased from 3 to 14, and 30 mph zones increased from 2 to 6. This indicates a shift in crash distribution from higher to lower speed limit zones.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28 (28 days)
  • Geographic scope: BURLINGTON, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 38
  • Total persons involved: 95
  • Total vehicles involved: 73

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "BURLINGTON, MA Crash Intelligence Report: February 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/burlington/february-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Burlington, MA Crash Report — February 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com