Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

49 CRASHES IN
DANVERS, MA
JANUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstJanuary 2025

In January 2026, Danvers experienced 49 crashes, marking a 28.9% increase compared to the 38 crashes reported in January 2025. The total number of injuries saw a substantial rise from 7 to 22, representing the most notable year-over-year shift. There were no fatal crashes in either period.

49

28.9%was 38

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

22

214.3%was 7

Persons Injured

3

50.0%was 2

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

The overall trend indicates an increase in crash activity year-over-year, with total crashes rising from 38 to 49, an increase of 11 crashes. Concurrently, the total number of injuries significantly increased from 7 to 22, indicating a worsening outcome for those involved in crashes.

3

Hit-and-Run Crashes — January 2026

50.0% vs prior (2)

Hit-and-run crashes increased from 2 in January 2025 to 3 in January 2026. This resulted in an increase in the hit-and-run rate from 5.3% to 6.1% of all crashes.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Pedestrians Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Cyclists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

1

Pedestrians Injured

Prior: 0%

1

Cyclists Injured

Prior: 0%

20

Motorists Injured

Prior: 7185.7%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The peak day for crashes shifted from Monday with 9 crashes in January 2025 to Saturday with 11 crashes in January 2026. The peak hour for crashes also shifted from 5 p.m. in the prior period to 3 p.m. in the current period, with both hours recording 5 crashes.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

The proportion of crashes resulting in injury significantly increased from 18.4% (7 out of 38 crashes) in January 2025 to 34.7% (17 out of 49 crashes) in January 2026. The current period saw 1 serious injury crash, which was not present in the prior period, while minor injury crashes rose from 5 to 12.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury1serious injury crashes2%
Minor Injury12minor injury crashes24.5%
140.0%prior 5
Possible Injury4possible injury crashes8.2%
100.0%prior 2
No Injury32no injury crashes65.3%
3.2%prior 31

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The leading contributing factor in the current period was "Failed to yield right of way" with 11 crashes, a substantial increase from 2 crashes in the prior period. Conversely, "Inattention" crashes decreased from 12 to 5, moving from the top factor to the third. Crashes attributed to "No improper driving" increased from 6 to 8.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

Failed to yield right of way11 (22.4%)
No improper driving8 (16.3%)33.3%prior 6
Inattention5 (10.2%)-58.3%prior 12
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings4 (8.2%)
Followed too closely4 (8.2%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road3 (6.1%)
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner3 (6.1%)
Visibility obstructed2 (4.1%)
Glare1 (2%)
Other improper action1 (2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

The proportion of crashes occurring in adverse weather conditions (snow, rain, cloudy) slightly increased from 21.1% to 24.5%. Similarly, crashes on adverse road surfaces (snow, wet, ice) saw a slight increase from 26.3% to 30.6%. The number of crashes occurring during daylight hours increased from 25 to 31.

Weather

Clear28 (57.1%)
3.7%prior 27
Clear/Clear9 (18.4%)
Snow/Snow2 (4.1%)
Snow2 (4.1%)
Cloudy/Clear1 (2.0%)
Rain1 (2.0%)
Rain/Cloudy1 (2.0%)
Rain/Rain1 (2.0%)
Clear/Cloudy1 (2.0%)
Snow/Blowing sand, snow1 (2.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight31 (63.3%)
24.0%prior 25
Dark - lighted roadway10 (20.4%)
25.0%prior 8
Dark - roadway not lighted3 (6.1%)
Dawn3 (6.1%)
Dusk2 (4.1%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry34 (69.4%)
25.9%prior 27
Snow6 (12.2%)
Wet6 (12.2%)
0.0%prior 6
Ice3 (6.1%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The total number of vehicles involved in crashes increased from 75 to 94 year-over-year. A notable shift in person demographics shows a decrease in the 0-15 age group from 32 to 7, while the 26-34 age group saw a substantial increase from 10 to 22. The top vehicle makes involved shifted, with Toyota decreasing from 15 to 11, and Ford increasing from 5 to 11.

Top Vehicle Makes (94 vehicles)

1
HONDA12 (12.8%)
0.0%prior 12
2
FORD11 (11.7%)
120.0%prior 5
3
TOYOTA11 (11.7%)
-26.7%prior 15
4
CHEVROLET8 (8.5%)
60.0%prior 5
5
SUBARU7 (7.4%)
6
ACURA4 (4.3%)
7
FRHT3 (3.2%)
8
BMW3 (3.2%)
9
JEEP3 (3.2%)
10
VOLKSWAGEN3 (3.2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Vehicle unit records

1 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (117 persons with recorded sex)

Male68 (58.1%)
17.2%prior 58
Female49 (41.9%)
-3.9%prior 51

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

The distribution of crashes across speed zones shifted, with a notable increase in crashes within 25 MPH zones, rising from 3 to 10. Crashes in 30 MPH zones slightly decreased from 20 to 17. Additionally, the current period reported 3 crashes in 65 MPH zones, which were not observed in the prior period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31 (31 days)
  • Geographic scope: DANVERS, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 49
  • Total persons involved: 118
  • Total vehicles involved: 94

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "DANVERS, MA Crash Intelligence Report: January 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/danvers/january-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Danvers, MA Crash Report — January 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com