Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

34 CRASHES IN
EAST LONGMEADOW, MA
FEBRUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstFebruary 2025

In February 2026, EAST LONGMEADOW experienced 34 total crashes, a 61.9% increase compared to the 21 crashes recorded in February 2025. The most notable year-over-year shift was the significant rise in total crashes, alongside an increase in total injuries from 5 to 6.

34

61.9%was 21

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

6

20.0%was 5

Persons Injured

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

The overall trend indicates a substantial increase in crash incidents year-over-year. Total crashes rose from 21 in February 2025 to 34 in February 2026, marking a 61.9% increase. Total injuries also increased by 20%, from 5 to 6.

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes — February 2026

0.0% vs prior (1)

The number of hit-and-run crashes remained constant at 1 in both February 2025 and February 2026. However, due to the overall increase in total crashes, the hit-and-run rate decreased from 4.8% in February 2025 to 2.9% in February 2026.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

6

Motorists Injured

Prior: 520.0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The peak day for crashes shifted from Tuesday with 7 crashes in February 2025 to Friday with 9 crashes in February 2026. The peak hour also changed, moving from 6 p.m. with 3 crashes in February 2025 to 12 p.m. with 6 crashes in February 2026, indicating a shift in high-frequency crash times.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

There were no fatal crashes or fatalities in either February 2025 or February 2026. Total injuries increased from 5 to 6 year-over-year. In February 2025, there was 1 serious injury, which was not present in February 2026, where injuries were categorized as 5 minor and 1 possible.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Minor Injury5minor injury crashes14.7%
400.0%prior 1
Possible Injury1possible injury crashes2.9%
-50.0%prior 2
No Injury28no injury crashes82.4%
64.7%prior 17

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The number of crashes attributed to 'No improper driving' increased from 7 in February 2025 to 11 in February 2026, though its share of total crashes slightly decreased from 33.3% to 32.4%. Crashes due to 'Failed to yield right of way' saw a significant increase in count from 3 to 8, and its share rose from 14.3% to 23.5%. Additionally, crashes involving 'Exceeded authorized speed limit' and 'Driving too fast for conditions' each appeared once in February 2026, whereas they were not listed in February 2025.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving11 (32.4%)57.1%prior 7
Failed to yield right of way8 (23.5%)
Inattention4 (11.8%)
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings3 (8.8%)
Followed too closely1 (2.9%)
Glare1 (2.9%)
Made an improper turn1 (2.9%)
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway1 (2.9%)
Distracted1 (2.9%)
Driving too fast for conditions1 (2.9%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring in 'Clear' weather conditions increased from 14 in February 2025 to 21 in February 2026, while 'Snow' condition crashes doubled from 2 to 4. For road surface conditions, crashes on 'Wet' surfaces increased from 2 to 9, and on 'Snow' surfaces from 1 to 7. Crashes during 'Daylight' hours increased from 12 to 23, and during 'Dark - lighted roadway' conditions from 7 to 8.

Weather

Clear21 (61.8%)
50.0%prior 14
Snow4 (11.8%)
Clear/Unknown2 (5.9%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (2.9%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)/Blowing sand, snow1 (2.9%)
Snow/Blowing sand, snow1 (2.9%)
Blowing sand, snow/Snow1 (2.9%)
Snow/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (2.9%)
Cloudy1 (2.9%)
Rain1 (2.9%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight23 (67.6%)
91.7%prior 12
Dark - lighted roadway8 (23.5%)
14.3%prior 7
Dark - roadway not lighted2 (5.9%)
Dusk1 (2.9%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry17 (50.0%)
6.3%prior 16
Wet9 (26.5%)
Snow7 (20.6%)
Ice1 (2.9%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

Top Vehicle Makes (60 vehicles)

1
HYUNDAI9 (15%)
2
FORD8 (13.3%)
3
TOYOTA7 (11.7%)
40.0%prior 5
4
HONDA6 (10%)
5
NISSAN5 (8.3%)
6
SUBARU4 (6.7%)
7
CHEVROLET3 (5%)
8
MERCEDES-BENZ2 (3.3%)
9
JEEP2 (3.3%)
10
LEXUS2 (3.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Vehicle unit records

3 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (63 persons with recorded sex)

Male33 (52.4%)
43.5%prior 23
Female30 (47.6%)
100.0%prior 15

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in 25 mph zones increased from 8 in February 2025 to 12 in February 2026, and in 35 mph zones from 9 to 13. A 15 mph speed limit zone was present in February 2025 with 1 crash, but not in February 2026, while a 45 mph zone appeared in February 2026 with 3 crashes, not present in February 2025. No fatal crashes were recorded in any speed zone during either period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28 (28 days)
  • Geographic scope: EAST LONGMEADOW, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 34
  • Total persons involved: 66
  • Total vehicles involved: 60

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "EAST LONGMEADOW, MA Crash Intelligence Report: February 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/east-longmeadow/february-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

East Longmeadow, MA Crash Report — February 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com