Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

43 CRASHES IN
GLOUCESTER, MA
JANUARY 2022

All metrics benchmarked againstJanuary 2021

In January 2022, GLOUCESTER experienced 43 total crashes, an increase of 16.2% compared to the 37 crashes recorded in January 2021. The most notable year-over-year shift was a 400% increase in total injuries, rising from 2 to 10.

43

16.2%was 37

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

10

400.0%was 2

Persons Injured

4

100.0%was 2

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 2 crashes with unreported severity are not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Overall, crash activity in GLOUCESTER showed an upward trend year-over-year, with total crashes increasing by 16.2% from 37 to 43. This period also saw a significant 400% rise in total injuries, from 2 to 10.

4

Hit-and-Run Crashes — January 2022

100.0% vs prior (2)

Hit-and-run crashes increased from 2 in January 2021 to 4 in January 2022. The hit-and-run rate also rose from 5.4% to 9.3% of total crashes. This indicates an upward trend in both the count and rate of hit-and-run incidents year-over-year.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Pedestrians Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

1

Pedestrians Injured

Prior: 0%

9

Motorists Injured

Prior: 2350.0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The peak day for crashes shifted from Wednesday, with 10 crashes in the prior period, to Thursday, with 8 crashes in the current period. The peak hour also changed from 5 PM (4 crashes) in the prior period to 11 AM (5 crashes) in the current period. Crashes on Monday saw a notable increase from 2 to 7.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Both periods reported 0 total fatalities and 0 fatal crashes. However, total injuries increased significantly from 2 in January 2021 to 10 in January 2022. The proportion of crashes resulting in minor injury (B) increased from 5.4% to 14%, and serious injury (A) crashes, with 1 incident, appeared in the current period.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury1serious injury crashes2.3%
Minor Injury6minor injury crashes14%
200.0%prior 2
Possible Injury2possible injury crashes4.7%
No Injury32no injury crashes74.4%
14.3%prior 28

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The factor 'No improper driving' decreased from 14 crashes in the prior period to 10 crashes in the current period. 'Glare' emerged as a contributing factor with 4 crashes in the current period, compared to 0 in the prior period. Additionally, 'Failed to yield right of way' increased from 0 to 3 crashes, and 'Driving too fast for conditions' increased from 0 to 2 crashes.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving10 (23.3%)-28.6%prior 14
Glare4 (9.3%)
Inattention4 (9.3%)
Failed to yield right of way3 (7%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road2 (4.7%)
Driving too fast for conditions2 (4.7%)
Over-correcting/over-steering2 (4.7%)
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway1 (2.3%)
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner1 (2.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring in clear weather conditions increased from 22 to 26, while snow-related crashes increased from 4 to 7. Crashes on wet road surfaces increased from 2 to 6, and on icy surfaces from 1 to 4. Crashes during daylight hours increased from 20 to 30.

Weather

Clear26 (60.5%)
18.2%prior 22
Snow7 (16.3%)
Clear/Other3 (7.0%)
Cloudy2 (4.7%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (2.3%)
Snow/Cloudy1 (2.3%)
Fog, smog, smoke/Rain1 (2.3%)
Other1 (2.3%)
Rain1 (2.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight30 (69.8%)
50.0%prior 20
Dark - lighted roadway11 (25.6%)
-8.3%prior 12
Dark - roadway not lighted2 (4.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry26 (60.5%)
4.0%prior 25
Snow7 (16.3%)
-22.2%prior 9
Wet6 (14.0%)
Ice4 (9.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The total number of vehicles involved in crashes increased from 66 to 78, and the total number of persons involved rose from 67 to 92. The 35-44 age group saw a notable increase in persons involved, from 1 in the prior period to 15 in the current period. Toyota remained a top vehicle make, though its count decreased from 11 to 10, while Honda increased from 8 to 10.

Top Vehicle Makes (78 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA10 (12.8%)
-9.1%prior 11
2
HONDA10 (12.8%)
25.0%prior 8
3
CHEVROLET9 (11.5%)
28.6%prior 7
4
FORD8 (10.3%)
-20.0%prior 10
5
JEEP6 (7.7%)
20.0%prior 5
6
GMC6 (7.7%)
7
NISSAN5 (6.4%)
8
MAZDA3 (3.8%)
9
VOLKSWAGEN3 (3.8%)
10
DODGE3 (3.8%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Vehicle unit records

14 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (74 persons with recorded sex)

Male42 (56.8%)
23.5%prior 34
Female32 (43.2%)
68.4%prior 19

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in the 25 mph speed zone increased from 12 in the prior period to 16 in the current period, while crashes in the 20 mph zone decreased from 5 to 2. The current period also reported crashes in 30 mph (5 crashes), 45 mph (1 crash), and 55 mph (3 crashes) zones, which were not present in the prior period's data. Both periods recorded 0 fatalities in all speed zones.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2022-01-01 through 2022-01-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2022-01-01 through 2022-01-31 (31 days)
  • Geographic scope: GLOUCESTER, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 43
  • Total persons involved: 92
  • Total vehicles involved: 78

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "GLOUCESTER, MA Crash Intelligence Report: January 2022." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2022-01-01 to 2022-01-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/gloucester/january-2022-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Gloucester, MA Crash Report — January 2022 | ThatCarHitMe.com