Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

13 CRASHES IN
GRAFTON, MA
FEBRUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstFebruary 2025

In February 2026, Grafton experienced a significant reduction in traffic incidents compared to February 2025, with total crashes decreasing from 41 to 13, representing a 68.29% decline. This period also saw a 100% decrease in fatalities, with 0 recorded in the current period compared to 1 in the prior period. The total number of injured persons also fell by 37.5%, from 8 to 5.

13

-68.3%was 41

Total Crash Events

0

-100.0%was 1

Persons Killed

5

-37.5%was 8

Persons Injured

1

-66.7%was 3

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Overall, crash trends in Grafton show a notable decrease year-over-year. Total crashes declined by 68.29%, from 41 in February 2025 to 13 in February 2026. Fatalities decreased from 1 to 0, and total injuries fell by 37.5%, from 8 to 5.

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes — February 2026

-66.7% vs prior (3)

The number of hit-and-run crashes decreased from 3 in February 2025 to 1 in February 2026. Despite this reduction in count, the hit-and-run rate slightly increased from 7.3% of total crashes in the prior period to 7.7% in the current period.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

5

Motorists Injured

Prior: 7-28.6%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The temporal patterns of crashes shifted year-over-year, with the peak day for crashes changing from Monday and Friday (8 crashes each) in February 2025 to Saturday (4 crashes) in February 2026. The peak hour for crashes also moved from 2 PM (7 crashes) in the prior period to 9 AM (5 crashes) in the current period, indicating a shift in when incidents are most frequent.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Crash severity distributions saw a positive change year-over-year. The prior period recorded 1 fatal crash and 1 serious injury crash, while the current period had 0 fatal crashes and 0 serious injury crashes. The number of minor injury crashes increased from 3 in the prior period to 4 in the current period, while possible injury crashes decreased from 4 to 1.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Minor Injury4minor injury crashes30.8%
33.3%prior 3
No Injury9no injury crashes69.2%
-71.0%prior 31

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

Contributing factors saw significant shifts in counts year-over-year. Crashes attributed to 'No improper driving' decreased by 4, from 10 in the prior period to 6 in the current period. 'Inattention' and 'Followed too closely,' which accounted for 7 and 5 crashes respectively in the prior period, were not recorded as factors in the current period. Conversely, 'Fatigued/asleep' emerged as a factor in 3 crashes in the current period, up from 0 in the prior period.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving6 (46.2%)-40.0%prior 10
Fatigued/asleep3 (23.1%)
Driving too fast for conditions1 (7.7%)
Failed to yield right of way1 (7.7%)
Other improper action1 (7.7%)
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway1 (7.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

There was a proportional shift towards adverse conditions in the current period. Crashes occurring in adverse weather (snow, sleet, hail, rain) or road surface conditions (snow, wet, ice) accounted for 61.5% of incidents in February 2026 (8 out of 13 crashes), compared to 41.5% (17 out of 41 crashes) in February 2025. Crashes on dry road surfaces decreased from 22 to 5, and crashes in clear weather decreased from 17 to 2.

Weather

Clear/Clear4 (30.8%)
Snow4 (30.8%)
-33.3%prior 6
Clear2 (15.4%)
-88.2%prior 17
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)/Snow1 (7.7%)
Snow/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (7.7%)
Snow/Snow1 (7.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight9 (69.2%)
-67.9%prior 28
Dark - lighted roadway2 (15.4%)
-60.0%prior 5
Dark - roadway not lighted1 (7.7%)
Dawn1 (7.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Snow6 (46.2%)
-25.0%prior 8
Dry5 (38.5%)
-77.3%prior 22
Wet2 (15.4%)
-60.0%prior 5

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

Top Vehicle Makes (20 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA6 (30%)
-40.0%prior 10
2
HONDA2 (10%)
-60.0%prior 5
3
FORD2 (10%)
-60.0%prior 5
4
MAZDA2 (10%)
5
MACK1 (5%)
6
SUBARU1 (5%)
7
BMW1 (5%)
8
WSTR1 (5%)
9
CHEVROLET1 (5%)
10
ICRP1 (5%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Vehicle unit records

3 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (18 persons with recorded sex)

Male10 (55.6%)
-80.4%prior 51
Female8 (44.4%)
-69.2%prior 26

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes across various speed zones saw reductions year-over-year. Crashes in 30 mph zones decreased by 7, from 12 in the prior period to 5 in the current period, while crashes in 65 mph zones decreased by 5, from 10 to 5. The 35 mph zone, which had 1 fatal crash in the prior period, recorded 0 fatal crashes in the current period, with total crashes in this zone decreasing from 6 to 2.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28 (28 days)
  • Geographic scope: GRAFTON, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 13
  • Total persons involved: 21
  • Total vehicles involved: 20

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "GRAFTON, MA Crash Intelligence Report: February 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/grafton/february-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Grafton, MA Crash Report — February 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com