Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

23 CRASHES IN
GROTON, MA
FEBRUARY 2025

All metrics benchmarked againstFebruary 2024

GROTON experienced a substantial increase in total crashes in February 2025 compared to February 2024. Total crashes rose from 9 in the prior year to 23 in the current period, representing a 155.6% increase. The most notable year-over-year shift is the dramatic rise in overall crash incidents.

23

155.6%was 9

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

1

-66.7%was 3

Persons Injured

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 1 crash with unreported severity is not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

The overall trend indicates a significant increase in crashes year-over-year, with total incidents rising from 9 in February 2024 to 23 in February 2025. This represents a 155.6% increase in crash volume. This upward trend suggests a considerable deterioration in traffic safety during the current period.

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes — February 2025

4.3% hit-and-run rate this period vs 0.0% prior. Prior period: 0.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

1

Motorists Injured

Prior: 3-66.7%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

While Saturday remained the peak day for crashes in both periods, with 7 crashes in February 2025 compared to 2 in February 2024, the peak hour shifted. In February 2024, the peak hour was 5 AM with 2 crashes, whereas in February 2025, the peak hour was 4 PM with 3 crashes, indicating a shift in crash concentration to the afternoon commute.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Both periods reported zero fatalities. However, total injuries decreased from 3 in February 2024 to 1 in February 2025. The proportion of minor injury crashes also decreased, accounting for 4.3% of crashes in the current period (1 minor injury crash) compared to 22.2% in the prior period (2 minor injury crashes).

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Minor Injury1minor injury crashes4.3%
-50.0%prior 2
No Injury21no injury crashes91.3%
200.0%prior 7

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The contributing factors show notable shifts in crash counts and rankings. 'Inattention' crashes increased from 3 in February 2024 to 6 in February 2025, and 'Driving too fast for conditions' crashes rose from 1 to 4. 'No improper driving' was the most frequent factor in February 2025 with 11 crashes (47.8% share), while 'Inattention' was the most frequent in February 2024 with 3 crashes (33.3% share).

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving11 (47.8%)
Inattention6 (26.1%)
Driving too fast for conditions4 (17.4%)
Failed to yield right of way2 (8.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

February 2025 saw a broader range of adverse weather and road conditions contributing to crashes compared to February 2024. While 7 out of 9 crashes in the prior period occurred in clear weather and 8 on dry roads, the current period recorded 8 crashes on snow, 5 on wet, and 4 on ice road surfaces. Crashes occurring during dark, lighted roadway conditions also increased from 1 to 6 year-over-year.

Weather

Clear10 (43.5%)
42.9%prior 7
Snow4 (17.4%)
Snow/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)3 (13.0%)
Clear/Cloudy2 (8.7%)
Cloudy/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (4.3%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (4.3%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)/Snow1 (4.3%)
Cloudy1 (4.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight14 (60.9%)
100.0%prior 7
Dark - lighted roadway6 (26.1%)
Dark - roadway not lighted2 (8.7%)
Dusk1 (4.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Snow8 (34.8%)
Dry6 (26.1%)
-25.0%prior 8
Wet5 (21.7%)
Ice4 (17.4%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

Top Vehicle Makes (38 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA7 (18.4%)
2
HONDA5 (13.2%)
3
CHEVROLET3 (7.9%)
4
SUBARU3 (7.9%)
5
FORD3 (7.9%)
6
GMC3 (7.9%)
7
NISSAN2 (5.3%)
8
KIA2 (5.3%)
9
HYUNDAI2 (5.3%)
10
THMS2 (5.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Vehicle unit records

3 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (44 persons with recorded sex)

Female22 (50.0%)
214.3%prior 7
Male22 (50.0%)
120.0%prior 10

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in February 2025 occurred exclusively in 30 mph and 35 mph zones, with 17 and 6 crashes respectively. This marks a shift from February 2024, which also reported crashes in 10 mph (1 crash) and 20 mph (1 crash) zones. Crashes in 30 mph zones increased from 4 to 17, and in 35 mph zones from 3 to 6, with no fatalities recorded in any speed zone in either period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2025-02-01 through 2025-02-28
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2025-02-01 through 2025-02-28 (28 days)
  • Geographic scope: GROTON, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 23
  • Total persons involved: 47
  • Total vehicles involved: 38

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "GROTON, MA Crash Intelligence Report: February 2025." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/groton/february-2025-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company