Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

11 CRASHES IN
LAKEVILLE, MA
FEBRUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstFebruary 2025

Lakeville experienced a slight decrease in total crashes, from 12 in February 2025 to 11 in February 2026, representing an 8.3% reduction. This period saw a notable 50% decrease in total injuries, dropping from 2 to 1. The most significant shift in contributing factors was a 100% increase in crashes attributed to 'No improper driving', rising from 2 to 4.

11

-8.3%was 12

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

1

-50.0%was 2

Persons Injured

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Overall, crashes in Lakeville saw a minor decline year-over-year, decreasing from 12 crashes in February 2025 to 11 crashes in February 2026. Total fatalities remained at 0 in both periods, while total injuries decreased by 50%, from 2 to 1. This indicates a general downward trend in crash frequency and injury severity.

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes — February 2026

9.1% hit-and-run rate this period vs 0.0% prior. Prior period: 0.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

1

Motorists Injured

Prior: 2-50.0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The peak day for crashes shifted from Sunday, with 6 crashes in February 2025, to Saturday and Thursday, each with 3 crashes in February 2026. The peak crash hour also shifted, from 10 PM with 2 crashes in February 2025, to 9 PM with 2 crashes in February 2026. This suggests a shift in crash occurrence patterns away from Sundays and slightly earlier in the evening.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

There were no fatal crashes in either February 2025 or February 2026. Total injuries decreased from 2 in February 2025 to 1 in February 2026, a 50% reduction. The proportion of 'No Injury' crashes increased from 75% (9 crashes) in February 2025 to 90.9% (10 crashes) in February 2026, while 'Possible Injury' crashes, which accounted for 8.3% (1 crash) in February 2025, were absent in February 2026.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Minor Injury1minor injury crashes9.1%
0.0%prior 1
No Injury10no injury crashes90.9%
11.1%prior 9

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The count of crashes attributed to 'No improper driving' increased by 100%, from 2 in February 2025 to 4 in February 2026. Conversely, crashes due to 'Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road' decreased by 66.7%, from 3 to 1. 'Driving too fast for conditions', 'Exceeded authorized speed limit', and 'Failed to yield right of way' maintained consistent crash counts of 2, 1, and 1 respectively across both periods.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving4 (36.4%)
Driving too fast for conditions2 (18.2%)
Failed to yield right of way1 (9.1%)
Visibility obstructed1 (9.1%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road1 (9.1%)
Exceeded authorized speed limit1 (9.1%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring under 'Snow' road surface conditions remained consistent, with 6 crashes in both February 2025 and February 2026. 'Daylight' conditions saw a slight increase in crashes, from 4 in February 2025 to 5 in February 2026. The number of crashes under 'Dark - roadway not lighted' conditions remained stable at 5 in both periods.

Weather

Clear3 (27.3%)
Clear/Clear2 (18.2%)
Cloudy1 (9.1%)
Fog, smog, smoke1 (9.1%)
Snow1 (9.1%)
Snow/Severe crosswinds1 (9.1%)
Snow/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (9.1%)
Snow/Snow1 (9.1%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Dark - roadway not lighted5 (45.5%)
0.0%prior 5
Daylight5 (45.5%)
Dark - lighted roadway1 (9.1%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Snow6 (54.5%)
0.0%prior 6
Dry3 (27.3%)
Wet2 (18.2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

Top Vehicle Makes (15 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA4 (26.7%)
2
CHEVROLET2 (13.3%)
3
GMC1 (6.7%)
4
HONDA1 (6.7%)
5
CADI1 (6.7%)
6
INFI1 (6.7%)
7
MACK1 (6.7%)
8
NISSAN1 (6.7%)
9
SUBARU1 (6.7%)
10
HYUNDAI1 (6.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Vehicle unit records

Sex Distribution (17 persons with recorded sex)

Male11 (64.7%)
10.0%prior 10
Female6 (35.3%)
0.0%prior 6

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in the 40 mph speed zone decreased from 4 in February 2025 to 1 in February 2026, a reduction of 3 crashes. In contrast, crashes in the 65 mph speed zone increased from 1 to 3, and in the 45 mph zone from 2 to 3. There were no fatal crashes reported across any speed zones in either period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28 (28 days)
  • Geographic scope: LAKEVILLE, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 11
  • Total persons involved: 17
  • Total vehicles involved: 15

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "LAKEVILLE, MA Crash Intelligence Report: February 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/lakeville/february-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Lakeville, MA Crash Report — February 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com