Yearly Traffic Safety Analysis

254 CRASHES IN
LANCASTER, MA
2025

All metrics benchmarked against2024

In Lancaster, the total number of vehicle crashes was identical year-over-year, with 254 incidents recorded in both 2025 and 2024. While the overall volume of crashes remained stable, outcomes improved, with a 50% reduction in fatalities and a 14.5% drop in injuries. The most notable negative trend was a sharp 83.3% increase in crashes involving suspected DUI, which rose from 6 to 11.

254

Total Crash Events

1

-50.0%was 2

Persons Killed

94

-14.5%was 110

Persons Injured

13

18.2%was 11

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (1) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (1) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 4 crashes with unreported severity are not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

While the total number of crashes in Lancaster held steady at 254 for the second consecutive year, the severity of these incidents trended downward. Total fatalities fell by 50%, from 2 in 2024 to 1 in 2025. Similarly, the number of people injured in crashes decreased by 14.5%, from 110 to 94.

13

Hit-and-Run Crashes — 2025

18.2% vs prior (11)

Hit-and-run crashes trended upward in the current period compared to the prior year. The total count of hit-and-run incidents increased from 11 to 13. This rise is reflected in the hit-and-run rate, which grew from 4.3 to 5.1 incidents per 100 crashes.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Cyclists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

1

Motorists Killed

Prior: 2-50.0%

2

Cyclists Injured

Prior: 1100.0%

92

Motorists Injured

Prior: 107-14.0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The temporal patterns of crashes shifted between the two periods. The peak day for collisions moved from Friday (50 crashes) in the prior year to Thursday (46 crashes) in the current year. A similar shift occurred with the peak hour, which moved from the 5 PM hour (22 crashes) in 2024 to the 2 PM hour (23 crashes) in 2025.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

The overall severity of crashes in Lancaster decreased year-over-year. The fatal crash rate was halved, dropping from 0.79 to 0.39 fatal crashes per 100 total incidents. The share of crashes resulting in any injury also fell, from 29.9% (76 crashes) in the prior year to 27.2% (69 crashes) in the current year, corresponding to an increase in the proportion of no-injury crashes from 68.1% to 70.9%.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Fatal1fatal crashes0.4%
-50.0%prior 2
Serious Injury2serious injury crashes0.8%
-66.7%prior 6
Minor Injury38minor injury crashes15%
-9.5%prior 42
Possible Injury29possible injury crashes11.4%
3.6%prior 28
No Injury180no injury crashes70.9%
4.0%prior 173

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The leading contributing factors to crashes saw a shift in ranking. "Failed to yield right of way" moved up to become the second-most common factor, with its count increasing from 30 to 32 crashes. In contrast, "Followed too closely" dropped from second to third place, as its count fell by 24% from 33 to 25 incidents. The factor "Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner" saw a 50% increase in count, from 10 to 15 crashes.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving59 (23.2%)34.1%prior 44
Failed to yield right of way32 (12.6%)6.7%prior 30
Followed too closely25 (9.8%)-24.2%prior 33
Inattention23 (9.1%)-11.5%prior 26
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner15 (5.9%)50.0%prior 10
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road13 (5.1%)-18.8%prior 16
Driving too fast for conditions10 (3.9%)-28.6%prior 14
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings7 (2.8%)-30.0%prior 10
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway6 (2.4%)
Fatigued/asleep5 (2%)-58.3%prior 12

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crash conditions remained broadly consistent, with most incidents in both periods occurring in daylight on dry roads. The number of crashes on dry roads decreased slightly from 201 to 196, while crashes on wet roads saw a small increase from 34 to 36. Crashes during daylight hours were nearly unchanged, with 168 in the current period compared to 170 in the prior period.

Weather

Clear150 (59.1%)
-18.0%prior 183
Clear/Clear35 (13.8%)
337.5%prior 8
Cloudy20 (7.9%)
17.6%prior 17
Rain14 (5.5%)
-12.5%prior 16
Snow12 (4.7%)
33.3%prior 9
Rain/Cloudy3 (1.2%)
Cloudy/Rain3 (1.2%)
-50.0%prior 6
Clear/Cloudy2 (0.8%)
Rain/Rain2 (0.8%)
Cloudy/Cloudy2 (0.8%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight168 (66.1%)
-1.2%prior 170
Dark - roadway not lighted45 (17.7%)
-10.0%prior 50
Dark - lighted roadway20 (7.9%)
5.3%prior 19
Dawn14 (5.5%)
180.0%prior 5
Dark - unknown roadway lighting4 (1.6%)
Dusk3 (1.2%)
-57.1%prior 7

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry196 (77.2%)
-2.5%prior 201
Wet36 (14.2%)
5.9%prior 34
Snow14 (5.5%)
16.7%prior 12
Ice7 (2.8%)
Water (standing, moving)1 (0.4%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The top three vehicle makes involved in crashes remained Toyota, Honda, and Ford, though Toyota's involvement increased from 63 to 76 vehicles while Honda and Ford saw decreases. An analysis of person demographics shows the 35-44 age group was the most frequently involved in both years. Notably, the number of individuals aged 0-15 involved in crashes decreased from 37 to 15, while involvement for the 65+ age group increased from 56 to 68 persons.

Top Vehicle Makes (430 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA76 (17.7%)
20.6%prior 63
2
HONDA52 (12.1%)
-8.8%prior 57
3
FORD43 (10%)
-17.3%prior 52
4
CHEVROLET36 (8.4%)
12.5%prior 32
5
JEEP27 (6.3%)
68.8%prior 16
6
SUBARU23 (5.3%)
0.0%prior 23
7
NISSAN16 (3.7%)
-30.4%prior 23
8
KIA14 (3.3%)
0.0%prior 14
9
GMC14 (3.3%)
-22.2%prior 18
10
HYUNDAI12 (2.8%)
-20.0%prior 15

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Vehicle unit records

34 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (457 persons with recorded sex)

Male273 (59.7%)
-5.5%prior 289
Female184 (40.3%)
-12.4%prior 210

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

The distribution of crashes across speed zones shifted year-over-year. While the 30 mph zone accounted for the most crashes in both periods (89 incidents), crashes in the 35 mph zone decreased from 27 to 17. Conversely, crashes in the 65 mph zone increased from 8 to 13. The single fatal crash in 2025 occurred in a 35 mph zone, whereas the two fatal crashes in 2024 happened in 45 mph and 55 mph zones.

Fatal crashes by zone: 35 mph: 1 of 17 (5.882%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31 (365 days)
  • Geographic scope: LANCASTER, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 254
  • Total persons involved: 496
  • Total vehicles involved: 430

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "LANCASTER, MA Crash Intelligence Report: 2025." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/lancaster/2025-annual-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Lancaster, MA Crash Report — 2025 | ThatCarHitMe.com