Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

99 CRASHES IN
LEOMINSTER, MA
FEBRUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstFebruary 2025

In February 2026, Leominster experienced 99 total crashes, an 8.33% decrease from the 108 crashes reported in February 2025. Despite the reduction in total crashes, the number of total injuries increased significantly by 80%, rising from 15 in the prior period to 27 in the current period.

99

-8.3%was 108

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

27

80.0%was 15

Persons Injured

5

-44.4%was 9

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

The overall trend indicates a decrease in total crashes, with 99 crashes in February 2026 compared to 108 in February 2025, representing an 8.33% reduction. However, total injuries rose by 80%, from 15 to 27, suggesting that crashes in the current period were more severe on average.

5

Hit-and-Run Crashes — February 2026

-44.4% vs prior (9)

Hit-and-run crashes decreased from 9 in February 2025 to 5 in February 2026. Consequently, the hit-and-run rate also decreased, falling from 8.3% of total crashes in the prior period to 5.1% in the current period, indicating a downward trend.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

27

Motorists Injured

Prior: 1580.0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The temporal patterns shifted year-over-year; the peak day for crashes moved from Thursday with 22 crashes in February 2025 to Tuesday with 21 crashes in February 2026. The peak hour also changed from 3 PM with 12 crashes in the prior period to 2 PM with 11 crashes in the current period, indicating a slight shift in when the most crashes occurred.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

There were no fatal crashes in either period. However, the total number of injuries increased from 15 in February 2025 to 27 in February 2026. The current period saw 1 serious injury crash and 18 minor injury crashes, while the prior period had 5 minor injury crashes and 9 possible injury crashes, indicating a rise in the reported severity of injuries.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury1serious injury crashes1%
Minor Injury18minor injury crashes18.2%
260.0%prior 5
No Injury80no injury crashes80.8%
-14.9%prior 94

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

Inattention remained the top contributing factor, increasing slightly from 33 crashes in February 2025 to 35 crashes in February 2026, a 6.1% increase in count. 'Driving too fast for conditions' saw a substantial decrease, falling from 13 crashes in the prior period to 4 crashes in the current period, a 69.2% decrease in count. Conversely, 'No improper driving' increased by 71.4% in count, from 7 to 12 crashes, and became the second most frequent factor in the current period.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

Inattention35 (35.4%)6.1%prior 33
No improper driving12 (12.1%)71.4%prior 7
Failed to yield right of way9 (9.1%)-10.0%prior 10
Followed too closely7 (7.1%)-30.0%prior 10
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road6 (6.1%)-25.0%prior 8
Visibility obstructed5 (5.1%)
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner5 (5.1%)
Driving too fast for conditions4 (4%)-69.2%prior 13
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings3 (3%)
Glare2 (2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring in clear weather conditions increased from 65 in February 2025 to 79 in February 2026. There was a notable decrease in crashes occurring on snowy road surfaces, falling from 19 in the prior period to 13 in the current period, and crashes on icy surfaces decreased from 10 to 0. Crashes in dark, lighted roadway conditions decreased from 27 to 20, while daylight crashes remained relatively stable, increasing from 66 to 68.

Weather

Clear79 (79.8%)
21.5%prior 65
Snow6 (6.1%)
-45.5%prior 11
Clear/Clear6 (6.1%)
Cloudy3 (3.0%)
-70.0%prior 10
Snow/Cloudy1 (1.0%)
Snow/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (1.0%)
-87.5%prior 8
Cloudy/Snow1 (1.0%)
Rain/Blowing sand, snow1 (1.0%)
Snow/Blowing sand, snow1 (1.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight68 (68.7%)
3.0%prior 66
Dark - lighted roadway20 (20.2%)
-25.9%prior 27
Dark - roadway not lighted7 (7.1%)
16.7%prior 6
Dawn3 (3.0%)
-57.1%prior 7
Dusk1 (1.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry75 (75.8%)
15.4%prior 65
Snow13 (13.1%)
-31.6%prior 19
Wet10 (10.1%)
-16.7%prior 12
Slush1 (1.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The total number of vehicles involved in crashes decreased slightly from 196 in February 2025 to 189 in February 2026. Among top makes, FORD saw a decrease from 21 to 14 vehicles involved, while NISSAN increased from 8 to 14 vehicles. In terms of persons involved, the 65+ age group experienced a significant increase, rising from 19 persons in the prior period to 35 persons in the current period.

Top Vehicle Makes (189 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA32 (16.9%)
3.2%prior 31
2
HONDA23 (12.2%)
21.1%prior 19
3
CHEVROLET20 (10.6%)
11.1%prior 18
4
NISSAN14 (7.4%)
75.0%prior 8
5
FORD14 (7.4%)
-33.3%prior 21
6
HYUNDAI13 (6.9%)
0.0%prior 13
7
KIA9 (4.8%)
12.5%prior 8
8
JEEP7 (3.7%)
-12.5%prior 8
9
SUBARU6 (3.2%)
-50.0%prior 12
10
FRHT6 (3.2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Vehicle unit records

10 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (247 persons with recorded sex)

Male139 (56.3%)
2.2%prior 136
Female108 (43.7%)
21.3%prior 89

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in 30 mph zones decreased slightly from 47 in February 2025 to 46 in February 2026. Crashes in 35 mph zones increased from 20 to 23, while those in 55 mph zones decreased from 11 to 7. No fatal crashes were reported in any speed zone during either period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-02-01 through 2026-02-28 (28 days)
  • Geographic scope: LEOMINSTER, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 99
  • Total persons involved: 257
  • Total vehicles involved: 189

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "LEOMINSTER, MA Crash Intelligence Report: February 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-28. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/leominster/february-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Leominster, MA Crash Report — February 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com