Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

43 CRASHES IN
NEEDHAM, MA
FEBRUARY 2025

All metrics benchmarked againstFebruary 2024

In February 2025, Needham experienced 43 total crashes, an increase from the 31 crashes recorded in February 2024, representing a 38.7% rise. A notable shift was the significant decrease in hit-and-run crashes, which fell from 3 to 1, reducing the hit-and-run rate from 9.7% to 2.3%. Overall, crashes increased while total injuries decreased.

43

38.7%was 31

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

5

-37.5%was 8

Persons Injured

1

-66.7%was 3

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

The overall trend indicates an increase in total crashes year-over-year, rising from 31 crashes in February 2024 to 43 crashes in February 2025, a 38.7% increase. Conversely, the total number of injuries decreased from 8 to 5, representing a 37.5% reduction.

1

Hit-and-Run Crashes — February 2025

-66.7% vs prior (3)

Hit-and-run crashes decreased from 3 in February 2024 to 1 in February 2025. This led to a significant reduction in the hit-and-run rate, which fell from 9.7% of total crashes in the prior period to 2.3% in the current period, indicating a downward trend.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

5

Motorists Injured

Prior: 8-37.5%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The peak day for crashes remained Thursday in both periods, with 7 crashes in February 2024 and 12 crashes in February 2025. Similarly, the peak hour for crashes stayed at 3 PM, increasing from 4 crashes in the prior period to 6 crashes in the current period. This indicates consistent temporal patterns for peak crash occurrences despite the overall increase in crash volume.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Fatalities remained at 0 in both February 2024 and February 2025. Total injuries decreased from 8 persons in the prior period to 5 persons in the current period. February 2025 saw 1 serious injury crash (2.3% of total crashes), while February 2024 recorded 0 serious injury crashes and 4 possible injury crashes (12.9% of total crashes).

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury1serious injury crashes2.3%
Minor Injury3minor injury crashes7%
50.0%prior 2
No Injury39no injury crashes90.7%
56.0%prior 25

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

Among contributing factors, 'No improper driving' increased by 2 crashes, from 6 to 8. 'Failed to yield right of way' also saw an increase from 6 to 7 crashes, while 'Inattention' doubled from 3 to 6 crashes. 'Other improper action' decreased from 6 crashes in February 2024 to 3 crashes in February 2025.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving8 (18.6%)33.3%prior 6
Failed to yield right of way7 (16.3%)16.7%prior 6
Inattention6 (14%)
Followed too closely4 (9.3%)
Exceeded authorized speed limit3 (7%)
Other improper action3 (7%)-50.0%prior 6
Glare1 (2.3%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road1 (2.3%)
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway1 (2.3%)
Fatigued/asleep1 (2.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring in 'Clear' weather conditions decreased from 29 in February 2024 to 28 in February 2025, despite an overall increase in total crashes. Crashes on 'Dry' road surfaces also decreased from 29 to 28, while crashes on 'Snow' surfaces increased from 0 to 6, and 'Wet' surfaces increased from 2 to 6. Crashes during 'Daylight' increased from 23 to 30, and crashes in 'Dark - lighted roadway' rose from 3 to 9.

Weather

Clear28 (66.7%)
-3.4%prior 29
Rain3 (7.1%)
Cloudy3 (7.1%)
Snow3 (7.1%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)2 (4.8%)
Clear/Clear1 (2.4%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)/Snow1 (2.4%)
Clear/Cloudy1 (2.4%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight30 (69.8%)
30.4%prior 23
Dark - lighted roadway9 (20.9%)
Dark - roadway not lighted2 (4.7%)
Dusk2 (4.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry28 (65.1%)
-3.4%prior 29
Snow6 (14.0%)
Wet6 (14.0%)
Ice3 (7.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The total number of persons involved in crashes increased from 75 in February 2024 to 93 in February 2025. The 26-34 age group experienced a notable increase in involvement, rising from 7 to 17 persons, and the 65+ age group increased from 10 to 15 persons. Toyota remained the most frequently involved vehicle make, increasing from 11 to 15 vehicles, while Honda's representation dropped from 10 to 3 vehicles, falling out of the top two makes.

Top Vehicle Makes (79 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA15 (19%)
36.4%prior 11
2
FORD10 (12.7%)
100.0%prior 5
3
JEEP6 (7.6%)
4
MERCEDES-BENZ4 (5.1%)
5
BMW4 (5.1%)
6
HYUNDAI3 (3.8%)
7
NISSAN3 (3.8%)
8
KIA3 (3.8%)
9
MAZDA3 (3.8%)
10
CHEVROLET3 (3.8%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Vehicle unit records

12 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (80 persons with recorded sex)

Male41 (51.2%)
36.7%prior 30
Female39 (48.8%)
-4.9%prior 41

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in 30 mph zones increased from 20 in February 2024 to 26 in February 2025. Crashes in 25 mph zones, which were not present in the prior period, accounted for 7 crashes in February 2025. No fatalities were recorded in any speed zone during either period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2025-02-01 through 2025-02-28
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2025-02-01 through 2025-02-28 (28 days)
  • Geographic scope: NEEDHAM, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 43
  • Total persons involved: 93
  • Total vehicles involved: 79

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "NEEDHAM, MA Crash Intelligence Report: February 2025." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-28. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/needham/february-2025-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Needham, MA Crash Report — February 2025 | ThatCarHitMe.com