Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

100 CRASHES IN
PITTSFIELD, MA
JANUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstJanuary 2025

Total crashes in PITTSFIELD, MA increased by 33.33% from 75 in January 2025 to 100 in January 2026. This period also saw an increase in total injuries from 17 to 24, while fatalities remained at zero. A notable shift was the substantial increase in crashes occurring on snowy and icy road surfaces, indicating a potential impact of winter conditions.

100

33.3%was 75

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

24

41.2%was 17

Persons Injured

9

80.0%was 5

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 6 crashes with unreported severity are not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Overall, crash incidents in PITTSFIELD, MA showed an upward trend year-over-year, with total crashes increasing by 33.33% from 75 in January 2025 to 100 in January 2026. Concurrently, total injuries rose by 41.18%, from 17 to 24. Fatalities remained at zero for both periods, indicating no change in the most severe outcome.

9

Hit-and-Run Crashes — January 2026

80.0% vs prior (5)

The number of hit-and-run crashes increased from 5 in January 2025 to 9 in January 2026. This resulted in the hit-and-run crash rate rising from 6.7% to 9% of all crashes. This indicates an upward trend in hit-and-run incidents year-over-year.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Cyclists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

2

Cyclists Injured

Prior: 0%

22

Motorists Injured

Prior: 1457.1%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The temporal distribution of crashes shifted year-over-year, with Monday becoming the peak day for crashes in January 2026, recording 22 incidents compared to 9 in January 2025. Conversely, Thursday, which was the peak day in January 2025 with 18 crashes, saw a decrease to 15 crashes in January 2026. The peak crash hour also shifted slightly, with 3 PM recording 9 crashes in January 2026, while 2 PM was the peak in January 2025 with 10 crashes.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Crash severity patterns saw some changes year-over-year, although fatalities remained at zero for both January 2025 and January 2026. Total injuries increased from 17 to 24, corresponding to an injury crash rate of 24% in January 2026 compared to 22.67% in January 2025. Minor injuries (severity B) rose from 9 to 15, while possible injuries (severity C) remained consistent at 3. The prior period recorded 1 serious injury (severity A), which was not present in the current period.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Minor Injury15minor injury crashes15%
66.7%prior 9
Possible Injury3possible injury crashes3%
0.0%prior 3
No Injury76no injury crashes76%
33.3%prior 57

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

Comparing contributing factors, 'Inattention' saw the largest increase, rising from 6 crashes in January 2025 to 14 crashes in January 2026, a 133.33% increase in count. Conversely, 'Failed to yield right of way' decreased from 16 crashes to 10 crashes, representing a 37.5% reduction in count. 'No improper driving' increased slightly from 29 to 31 crashes, and 'Driving too fast for conditions' increased from 2 to 6 crashes.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving31 (31%)6.9%prior 29
Inattention14 (14%)133.3%prior 6
Failed to yield right of way10 (10%)-37.5%prior 16
Followed too closely6 (6%)0.0%prior 6
Driving too fast for conditions6 (6%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road4 (4%)
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner3 (3%)
Visibility obstructed3 (3%)
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings2 (2%)-60.0%prior 5
Made an improper turn2 (2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Adverse weather and road conditions played a more significant role in January 2026 compared to the prior year. Crashes on snowy road surfaces increased notably from 15 in January 2025 to 31 in January 2026, and crashes on icy roads rose from 3 to 13. Similarly, crashes during 'Snow' weather conditions increased from 2 to 21. There was also a substantial increase in crashes occurring in 'Dark - lighted roadway' conditions, rising from 14 to 29.

Weather

Clear54 (54.0%)
22.7%prior 44
Snow21 (21.0%)
Cloudy9 (9.0%)
-50.0%prior 18
Snow/Blowing sand, snow4 (4.0%)
Cloudy/Snow3 (3.0%)
Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)2 (2.0%)
Rain2 (2.0%)
Snow/Unknown1 (1.0%)
Cloudy/Rain1 (1.0%)
Cloudy/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)1 (1.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight60 (61.2%)
13.2%prior 53
Dark - lighted roadway29 (29.6%)
107.1%prior 14
Dark - roadway not lighted4 (4.1%)
Dusk3 (3.1%)
-40.0%prior 5
Dawn2 (2.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry40 (40.0%)
-11.1%prior 45
Snow31 (31.0%)
106.7%prior 15
Wet16 (16.0%)
45.5%prior 11
Ice13 (13.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The age distribution of persons involved in crashes showed shifts, with the 45-54 age group experiencing a doubling of involvement from 10 to 20 individuals. The 35-44 age group also saw a notable increase from 27 to 36 individuals, while the 65+ age group decreased from 29 to 24. Among vehicle makes, FORD saw a significant increase in involvement, moving from 13 vehicles in January 2025 to 26 in January 2026, becoming the top make.

Top Vehicle Makes (179 vehicles)

1
FORD26 (14.5%)
100.0%prior 13
2
TOYOTA24 (13.4%)
-11.1%prior 27
3
HONDA17 (9.5%)
6.3%prior 16
4
NISSAN14 (7.8%)
0.0%prior 14
5
HYUNDAI12 (6.7%)
9.1%prior 11
6
SUBARU12 (6.7%)
-20.0%prior 15
7
CHEVROLET10 (5.6%)
0.0%prior 10
8
JEEP9 (5%)
50.0%prior 6
9
DODGE9 (5%)
10
GMC4 (2.2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Vehicle unit records

22 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (177 persons with recorded sex)

Male102 (57.6%)
39.7%prior 73
Female75 (42.4%)
-3.8%prior 78

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes across various speed zones generally increased year-over-year, with no fatal crashes reported in any speed zone for either period. The 30 mph speed zone experienced the highest number of crashes in both periods, increasing from 28 to 33 incidents. Crashes in the 25 mph zone rose from 15 to 21, and in the 35 mph zone from 17 to 23.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31 (31 days)
  • Geographic scope: PITTSFIELD, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 100
  • Total persons involved: 200
  • Total vehicles involved: 179

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "PITTSFIELD, MA Crash Intelligence Report: January 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/pittsfield/january-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Pittsfield, MA Crash Report — January 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com