Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

33 CRASHES IN
ROCKLAND, MA
JANUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstJanuary 2025

ROCKLAND experienced a substantial increase in overall crash activity in January 2026 compared to January 2025. Total crashes rose by 65%, from 20 to 33, while total injuries saw a dramatic 366.67% increase, climbing from 3 to 14. This significant rise in injuries represents the most notable year-over-year shift in the data.

33

65.0%was 20

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

14

366.7%was 3

Persons Injured

0

-100.0%was 1

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

The overall trend indicates a significant increase in crash incidents, with total crashes rising by 65% from 20 in January 2025 to 33 in January 2026. Concurrently, total injuries surged by 366.67%, from 3 to 14, highlighting a concerning upward trajectory in crash severity.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

14

Motorists Injured

Prior: 3366.7%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The peak day for crashes shifted from Tuesday in January 2025 (8 crashes) to Monday in January 2026 (8 crashes), with Monday seeing a 300% increase in crashes from 2 to 8. The peak hour also changed, moving from 7 PM in the prior period (3 crashes) to 5 PM in the current period (6 crashes), representing a 500% increase in crashes at 5 PM.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

While there were no fatalities in either period, total injuries increased sharply by 366.67%, from 3 in January 2025 to 14 in January 2026. Crashes resulting in minor injuries (code 'B') doubled from 1 to 2, and possible injury crashes (code 'C') tripled from 2 to 6, indicating a greater proportion of crashes now involve some level of injury.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Minor Injury2minor injury crashes6.1%
100.0%prior 1
Possible Injury6possible injury crashes18.2%
200.0%prior 2
No Injury25no injury crashes75.8%
47.1%prior 17

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The top contributing factor, 'Failed to yield right of way,' increased by 83.3% from 6 crashes in January 2025 to 11 crashes in January 2026, becoming the most frequent factor. 'Inattention' crashes saw a 400% increase, rising from 1 to 5, moving it into the top three factors for the current period. 'No improper driving' also increased from 7 to 9 crashes, a 28.6% rise, but dropped from the top factor to the second most frequent.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

Failed to yield right of way11 (33.3%)83.3%prior 6
No improper driving9 (27.3%)28.6%prior 7
Inattention5 (15.2%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road2 (6.1%)
Made an improper turn1 (3%)
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings1 (3%)
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway1 (3%)
Driving too fast for conditions1 (3%)
Exceeded authorized speed limit1 (3%)
Glare1 (3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring in 'Clear' weather conditions increased by 46.2%, from 13 to 19, remaining the most common weather condition. Crashes on 'Wet' road surfaces increased by 200%, from 2 to 6, while 'Snow' road surface crashes increased by 500%, from 1 to 6. Additionally, 'Dark - roadway not lighted' conditions saw 5 crashes in January 2026, a category not present in the prior period's data.

Weather

Clear19 (57.6%)
46.2%prior 13
Cloudy4 (12.1%)
Snow/Snow2 (6.1%)
Clear/Clear2 (6.1%)
Snow2 (6.1%)
Cloudy/Unknown1 (3.0%)
Clear/Cloudy1 (3.0%)
Snow/Blowing sand, snow1 (3.0%)
Cloudy/Rain1 (3.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight19 (57.6%)
72.7%prior 11
Dark - lighted roadway8 (24.2%)
0.0%prior 8
Dark - roadway not lighted5 (15.2%)
Dawn1 (3.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry20 (60.6%)
42.9%prior 14
Snow6 (18.2%)
Wet6 (18.2%)
Ice1 (3.0%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

Top Vehicle Makes (57 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA10 (17.5%)
2
HONDA8 (14%)
3
NISSAN5 (8.8%)
4
CHEVROLET5 (8.8%)
5
FORD4 (7%)
-33.3%prior 6
6
KIA4 (7%)
7
SUBARU4 (7%)
8
JEEP3 (5.3%)
9
VOLVO2 (3.5%)
10
INFI1 (1.8%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Vehicle unit records

1 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (68 persons with recorded sex)

Male38 (55.9%)
26.7%prior 30
Female30 (44.1%)
172.7%prior 11

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in 30 mph zones increased by 116.7%, from 6 in January 2025 to 13 in January 2026, making it the most common speed zone for crashes in the current period. Crashes in 60 mph zones also saw a 200% increase, rising from 1 to 3. The 35 mph zone remained a significant area for crashes, with a slight increase from 8 to 9 crashes, and no fatalities were recorded in any speed zone for either period.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31 (31 days)
  • Geographic scope: ROCKLAND, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 33
  • Total persons involved: 70
  • Total vehicles involved: 57

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "ROCKLAND, MA Crash Intelligence Report: January 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/rockland/january-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Rockland, MA Crash Report — January 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com