Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis

41 CRASHES IN
SALEM, MA
JANUARY 2026

All metrics benchmarked againstJanuary 2025

In January 2026, Salem experienced 41 total crashes, a decrease of 12.8% compared to the 47 crashes recorded in January 2025. Total injuries also saw a reduction, from 15 to 12. The most notable shift was a 200% increase in pedestrian crashes, rising from 1 to 3.

41

-12.8%was 47

Total Crash Events

0

Persons Killed

12

-20.0%was 15

Persons Injured

5

-16.7%was 6

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (0) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (0) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 4 crashes with unreported severity are not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Overall, crash data for January 2026 indicates a downward trend in total incidents, with crashes decreasing by 12.8% year-over-year from 47 to 41. Similarly, total injuries fell by 20%, from 15 to 12. Fatalities remained at zero for both periods.

5

Hit-and-Run Crashes — January 2026

-16.7% vs prior (6)

Hit-and-run crashes decreased from 6 incidents in January 2025 to 5 incidents in January 2026. This resulted in a slight reduction in the hit-and-run rate, which fell from 12.8% to 12.2% of all crashes.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Pedestrians Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Motorists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Other Killed

Prior: 00.0%

2

Pedestrians Injured

Prior: 1100.0%

9

Motorists Injured

Prior: 14-35.7%

1

Other Injured

Prior: 0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The peak day for crashes shifted from Wednesday with 11 crashes in January 2025 to Monday with 10 crashes in January 2026. The peak hour also changed, moving from 2 PM with 7 crashes in the prior period to 3 PM with 6 crashes in the current period. These shifts indicate a change in the most frequent times for crash occurrences.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

Fatal crashes remained at zero in both January 2025 and January 2026, maintaining a 0% fatal crash rate. While serious injury crashes remained constant at 1, minor injury crashes increased from 3 to 5, and possible injury crashes decreased from 8 to 4. Overall, crashes resulting in any injury (serious, minor, or possible) decreased from 12 to 10 year-over-year.

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Serious Injury1serious injury crashes2.4%
0.0%prior 1
Minor Injury5minor injury crashes12.2%
66.7%prior 3
Possible Injury4possible injury crashes9.8%
-50.0%prior 8
No Injury27no injury crashes65.9%
-18.2%prior 33

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

Comparing contributing factors, crashes attributed to 'Driving too fast for conditions' increased by 200%, from 2 to 6 incidents. 'Inattention' also rose significantly, from 2 to 5 crashes, a 150% increase. Conversely, 'No improper driving' decreased by 50%, falling from 10 to 5 crashes, and 'Followed too closely' decreased by 60%, from 5 to 2 crashes.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

Driving too fast for conditions6 (14.6%)
Failed to yield right of way5 (12.2%)0.0%prior 5
Inattention5 (12.2%)
No improper driving5 (12.2%)-50.0%prior 10
Distracted3 (7.3%)
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road3 (7.3%)
Followed too closely2 (4.9%)-60.0%prior 5
Other improper action2 (4.9%)
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner1 (2.4%)
Glare1 (2.4%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crashes occurring in 'Clear/Clear' weather conditions decreased from 35 to 19, while those in 'Snow/Snow' conditions increased from 3 to 10. For road surface, crashes on 'Dry' roads decreased from 36 to 22, whereas crashes on 'Snow' surfaces increased from 3 to 12. In terms of lighting, crashes during 'Daylight' decreased from 23 to 19, and those in 'Dark - lighted roadway' conditions decreased from 20 to 17.

Weather

Clear/Clear19 (46.3%)
-45.7%prior 35
Snow/Snow10 (24.4%)
Clear6 (14.6%)
Cloudy/Cloudy4 (9.8%)
Cloudy/Snow1 (2.4%)
Rain/Rain1 (2.4%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight19 (46.3%)
-17.4%prior 23
Dark - lighted roadway17 (41.5%)
-15.0%prior 20
Dark - roadway not lighted2 (4.9%)
Other2 (4.9%)
Dusk1 (2.4%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry22 (53.7%)
-38.9%prior 36
Snow12 (29.3%)
Wet4 (9.8%)
Slush3 (7.3%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The ranking of top vehicle makes shifted, with Toyota becoming the most frequently involved make in January 2026 (14 incidents) after Honda led in January 2025 (20 incidents). The 26-34 age group continued to have the highest crash involvement, increasing from 24 to 27 persons. However, the 55-64 age group saw a notable decrease in involvement, from 12 to 4 persons.

Top Vehicle Makes (74 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA14 (18.9%)
-26.3%prior 19
2
HONDA13 (17.6%)
-35.0%prior 20
3
FORD8 (10.8%)
-27.3%prior 11
4
NISSAN6 (8.1%)
20.0%prior 5
5
BMW5 (6.8%)
0.0%prior 5
6
CHEVROLET4 (5.4%)
-42.9%prior 7
7
JEEP2 (2.7%)
8
SUBARU2 (2.7%)
9
LEXUS2 (2.7%)
10
MITS2 (2.7%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Vehicle unit records

9 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (77 persons with recorded sex)

Male42 (54.5%)
-12.5%prior 48
Female35 (45.5%)
-16.7%prior 42

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

Crashes in the 25 mph speed limit zone increased from 18 to 21 incidents year-over-year. Crashes at 1 mph zones increased from 2 to 3, while those at 5 mph zones decreased from 2 to 1. Fatal crash rates remained at 0% across all speed zones for both periods.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2026-01-01 through 2026-01-31 (31 days)
  • Geographic scope: SALEM, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 41
  • Total persons involved: 87
  • Total vehicles involved: 74

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "SALEM, MA Crash Intelligence Report: January 2026." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-01-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/salem/january-2026-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Salem, MA Crash Report — January 2026 | ThatCarHitMe.com