Yearly Traffic Safety Analysis

163 CRASHES IN
STERLING, MA
2025

All metrics benchmarked against2024

In 2025, Sterling recorded 163 traffic crashes, a 15.1% decrease from the 192 crashes documented in 2024. While total fatalities remained unchanged at one death in each period, the overall number of incidents and injuries saw a year-over-year decline. The most notable shift was the reduction in crashes attributed to driving under the influence, which fell by 60% from five incidents in 2024 to two in 2025.

163

-15.1%was 192

Total Crash Events

1

Persons Killed

54

-8.5%was 59

Persons Injured

4

-33.3%was 6

Hit-and-Run Crashes

Note: "Persons Killed" (1) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (1) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities. 1 crash with unreported severity is not shown in the severity breakdown.

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records

Trend Summary

Overall, traffic crashes in Sterling trended downward between 2024 and 2025. The total number of crashes decreased by 15.1%, from 192 to 163. This downward trend was also reflected in the number of people injured, which fell by 8.5% from 59 to 54, while fatalities held steady at one death in each year.

4

Hit-and-Run Crashes — 2025

-33.3% vs prior (6)

The number of hit-and-run incidents decreased from 6 in 2024 to 4 in 2025. This represents a downward trend in both absolute numbers and the rate of occurrence. The hit-and-run rate, calculated as a percentage of all crashes, fell from 3.1% in the prior year to 2.5% in the current year.

Vulnerable Road User Casualties

0

Pedestrians Killed

Prior: 00.0%

0

Cyclists Killed

Prior: 00.0%

1

Motorists Killed

Prior: 10.0%

0

Other Killed

Prior: 00.0%

1

Pedestrians Injured

Prior: 0%

2

Cyclists Injured

Prior: 1100.0%

50

Motorists Injured

Prior: 58-13.8%

1

Other Injured

Prior: 0%

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)

When Crashes Happen

The temporal patterns of crashes shifted notably between the two periods. In 2025, the peak day for crashes was Saturday with 31 incidents, a change from 2024 when Tuesday was the peak day with 41 incidents. Similarly, the peak hour for crashes moved from the afternoon at 3 p.m. in 2024 (23 crashes) to the morning at 8 a.m. in 2025 (19 crashes).

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)

Crash Severity Breakdown

While the number of fatal crashes remained constant at one for both years, the severity profile of non-fatal crashes changed. The count of serious injury crashes decreased significantly, falling from 6 incidents in 2024 to just 1 incident in 2025. Conversely, crashes involving minor injuries increased in count from 26 to 31, representing a larger share of total crashes (19% in 2025 vs. 13.5% in 2024).

Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)

Fatal1fatal crashes0.6%
0.0%prior 1
Serious Injury1serious injury crashes0.6%
-83.3%prior 6
Minor Injury31minor injury crashes19%
19.2%prior 26
Possible Injury12possible injury crashes7.4%
-25.0%prior 16
No Injury117no injury crashes71.8%
-18.2%prior 143

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · KABCO injury classification scale

Severity Distribution (Crash Events)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Most severe injury per crash record

Top Contributing Factors

The leading contributing factors for crashes saw some shifts in prevalence between 2024 and 2025. While 'Inattention' remained the top cited factor, its count increased from 24 to 30 incidents. In contrast, crashes attributed to 'Driving too fast for conditions' decreased from 19 to 11, and those involving fatigue dropped from 12 to 4. 'Failed to yield right of way' held steady with 17 incidents reported in both years, making it the second-most common factor in 2025.

Officer-Reported Primary Contributing Cause

No improper driving37 (22.7%)-38.3%prior 60
Inattention30 (18.4%)25.0%prior 24
Failed to yield right of way17 (10.4%)0.0%prior 17
Driving too fast for conditions11 (6.7%)-42.1%prior 19
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road10 (6.1%)0.0%prior 10
Followed too closely6 (3.7%)-50.0%prior 12
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings5 (3.1%)
Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner5 (3.1%)
Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, vulnerable user in roadway4 (2.5%)
Fatigued/asleep4 (2.5%)-66.7%prior 12

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Officer-reported primary contributory cause per crash

Road & Environmental Conditions

Crash conditions remained broadly consistent year-over-year, with most incidents in both periods occurring in daylight on dry roads. In 2025, 68.7% of crashes happened in daylight, compared to 69.3% in 2024. Crashes on dry road surfaces accounted for 66.9% of the total in 2025, versus 67.2% in 2024, showing no significant change in the proportion of adverse-condition crashes.

Weather

Clear87 (53.4%)
-15.5%prior 103
Cloudy14 (8.6%)
-22.2%prior 18
Clear/Other12 (7.4%)
-25.0%prior 16
Clear/Clear11 (6.7%)
120.0%prior 5
Snow9 (5.5%)
-40.0%prior 15
Snow/Sleet, hail (freezing rain or drizzle)6 (3.7%)
Cloudy/Rain6 (3.7%)
Snow/Rain3 (1.8%)
Rain3 (1.8%)
-76.9%prior 13
Cloudy/Snow2 (1.2%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Weather condition at time of crash

Lighting

Daylight112 (68.7%)
-15.8%prior 133
Dark - roadway not lighted30 (18.4%)
-11.8%prior 34
Dark - lighted roadway15 (9.2%)
-6.3%prior 16
Dusk3 (1.8%)
Dawn2 (1.2%)
Dark - unknown roadway lighting1 (0.6%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Lighting condition field

Road Surface

Dry109 (66.9%)
-15.5%prior 129
Snow21 (12.9%)
23.5%prior 17
Wet21 (12.9%)
-22.2%prior 27
Ice9 (5.5%)
-47.1%prior 17
Sand, mud, dirt, oil, gravel2 (1.2%)
Slush1 (0.6%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Road surface condition field

Vehicles & Demographics

The top three vehicle makes involved in crashes remained Toyota, Honda, and Ford in both years, though their counts decreased in line with the overall trend. Toyota, the most common make, was involved in 48 crashes in 2025, down from 57 in 2024. Analysis of persons involved shows a decrease in crash involvement for the 26-34 age group, which saw its count drop from 70 individuals in 2024 to 53 in 2025.

Top Vehicle Makes (254 vehicles)

1
TOYOTA48 (18.9%)
-15.8%prior 57
2
FORD24 (9.4%)
-25.0%prior 32
3
HONDA22 (8.7%)
-42.1%prior 38
4
CHEVROLET21 (8.3%)
-19.2%prior 26
5
HYUNDAI18 (7.1%)
50.0%prior 12
6
SUBARU17 (6.7%)
-29.2%prior 24
7
NISSAN16 (6.3%)
6.7%prior 15
8
GMC9 (3.5%)
80.0%prior 5
9
JEEP9 (3.5%)
-35.7%prior 14
10
KIA6 (2.4%)
20.0%prior 5

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Vehicle unit records

15 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.

Sex Distribution (284 persons with recorded sex)

Male179 (63.0%)
-7.3%prior 193
Female105 (37.0%)
-30.9%prior 152

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events

Speed Limit Zones

There was a notable reduction in crashes occurring in higher speed zones. Crashes in 65 mph zones decreased from 54 in 2024 to 34 in 2025, and incidents in 40 mph zones fell from 50 to 26. Despite the overall decrease in crashes in the 65 mph zone, it was the location of the single fatal crash in both 2024 and 2025.

Fatal crashes by zone: 65 mph: 1 of 34 (2.941%)

Source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV) · Arcgis_yearly Open Data · 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location

Data Sources & Methodology

Primary Data Source

All crash data in this report is sourced from Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), accessed programmatically via the Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.

Data Retrieval

  • Access method: Arcgis_yearly Open Data API (SoQL queries)
  • Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
  • Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
  • Date filter applied: 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31
  • Report generated: June 21, 2026

Data Coverage

  • Reporting period: 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31 (365 days)
  • Geographic scope: STERLING, MA
  • Total crash records analyzed: 163
  • Total persons involved: 303
  • Total vehicles involved: 254

Analytical Methodology

  • Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
  • Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
  • Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
  • Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
  • Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
  • Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
  • AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.

Limitations & Disclaimers

  • Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
  • Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
  • Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
  • AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
  • Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.

Non-Affiliation Disclosure

This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.

Data License

The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.

Corrections & Feedback

If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.

Suggested Citation

ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "STERLING, MA Crash Intelligence Report: 2025." Published June 21, 2026. Reporting period: 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31. Data source: Massachusetts Crash Data (MassDOT CDV), Arcgis_yearly Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/massachusetts/sterling/2025-annual-report

About the Publisher

ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.

Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai

ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company

Sterling, MA Crash Report — 2025 | ThatCarHitMe.com