Appellate Practice
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Successfully pursued an appeal of a Court of Appeals decision requiring Encompass to provide coverage for injuries arising from the Plaintiff’s use of a motorcycle insured with a different company. Kentucky’s Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals.
Additional Notes
Court held that UIM coverage exclusions are permissible under Kentucky law, and Encompass's 'regular use exclusion' was clear and unambiguous, meaning no coverage for the motorcycle accident.