Criminal Defense
Case results reflect publicly available information reported by the listed law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Case Details
Successfully appealed a trial court's ruling that a motion to suppress was not 'particularized' in Cochran v. State (A24A0013). The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, finding the motion sufficient to challenge the traffic stop, detention, arrest, and blood search warrant.
Additional Notes
The motion identified the search by date, officers, and circumstances, challenging the basis for the traffic stop, lack of probable cause for detention/arrest, and the search warrant for blood.