Package and food delivery now makes up a large and growing share of the traffic around you. Online shopping made up 16.6% of all U.S. retail sales in the fourth quarter of 2025, and that volume moves through a fleet of Amazon-branded vans, FedEx Ground trucks, and ordinary sedans carrying DoorDash or Instacart orders on the passenger seat.1 A crash with one of these vehicles can look just like any other rear-end collision or intersection wreck. The insurance and liability picture behind it is usually more complicated, and it changes depending on which company's logo was on the vehicle.
Why delivery vans aren't regulated like big rigs
Here's a fact most people don't expect: the driver who hit you may not be legally a trucker at all, even if the van was the size of a small moving truck. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations fully apply only to a commercial motor vehicle, defined in 49 CFR 390.5 as one with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 pounds or more, or one placarded for hazmat or built to carry 16 or more people.2 Most last-mile delivery vans sit at or just under that line. Rivian's smaller Electric Delivery Van models built for Amazon, the EDV 500 and 700, carry a gross vehicle weight rating of about 9,350 pounds, reportedly by design.3 Stay under 10,001 pounds and a carrier avoids federal hours-of-service limits, roadside inspection rules, and the requirement to mark the vehicle with a USDOT number.
A separate, higher threshold governs who needs a commercial driver's license: 26,001 pounds GVWR, or a combination vehicle at or above that weight.4 Federal drug and alcohol testing under 49 CFR Part 382 attaches to that same CDL-covered fleet, plus hazmat carriers and large-passenger vehicles.5 Put those two rules together and an Amazon or FedEx Ground van driver typically has no CDL, has never taken a DOT medical exam, and isn't part of the testing pool that applies to interstate trucking. The companies still run their own hiring and safety programs, but the federal trucking rulebook that governs an 18-wheeler mostly doesn't reach the van that hit you.
How dangerous is delivery driving
The job carries real risk regardless of which regulations technically apply. Workers in transportation and material-moving occupations, the government category that includes delivery drivers and couriers, had a fatal injury rate of 12.5 per 100,000 full-time workers in 2024, nearly four times the 3.3 rate across all occupations, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.6 NHTSA's Fatality Analysis Reporting System uses that same 10,000-pound cutoff to define a large truck, so most delivery vans get counted as ordinary passenger vehicles in federal crash statistics rather than tracked as their own category. Large trucks that do cross the line made up 9% of vehicles in fatal crashes in 2021 and were involved in a multivehicle crash 81% of the time, compared with 63% for passenger vehicles, according to FMCSA's Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts.7
Amazon's contractor drivers
Amazon almost never employs its delivery drivers directly. Most Amazon-branded vans are operated by Delivery Service Partners, independently owned logistics companies that contract with Amazon; the DSP owner hires and pays the drivers, not Amazon. DSP contracts require the partner to carry commercial auto liability insurance, commonly a $1 million per-occurrence limit, along with separate workers' compensation and cargo coverage.8 Amazon also runs Amazon Flex, where individual drivers use their own personal vehicles and get paid by the delivery block, closer to a rideshare arrangement than a job. Amazon backs Flex trips with its own contingent policy, providing up to $1 million in third-party liability coverage plus limited comprehensive and collision protection for the driver's own car, but only while a delivery block is actually active; drive for a different gig between blocks and that coverage disappears.9 Amazon has also rolled out more than 40,000 Rivian electric vans nationwide, with a stated goal of 100,000 by 2030.10 Many of those vans, and much of the rest of the fleet, carry AI-monitored, multi-lens dash cameras that flag hard braking and distracted driving in real time and upload the footage to a company dashboard.11 That footage belongs to Amazon and the DSP, not the driver, and it is often recoverable if you ask for it before it gets cycled out.
FedEx runs two employment models under one brand
That split changes who you'd sue. FedEx Express drivers are direct employees driving FedEx-owned trucks. FedEx Ground instead works through Independent Service Providers, separately owned businesses that contract with FedEx Ground and then employ their own drivers. FedEx Ground used to contract directly with individual drivers as independent contractors, a structure the Ninth Circuit rejected in Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System, holding that roughly 2,300 California drivers were actually employees because FedEx controlled their appearance, vehicles, and delivery routes closely enough to erase any real independence.12 FedEx settled that case for $228 million in 2015 and has since restructured its Ground operation around the ISP model nationwide.13
Whether a driver counts as an employee for liability purposes still depends on which test a court applies, and that test varies by state. California's Dynamex decision replaced the older, multi-factor right-to-control test with a stricter three-part ABC test that makes it harder for a company to label a worker a contractor.14 Many other states still apply a version of the older common-law test. The difference can decide whether a delivery company is automatically on the hook for a crash or has to be sued through a separate, thinly capitalized contractor entity instead, which is exactly the kind of variation a state-specific page needs to walk through in detail.
Gig delivery apps and the coverage gap
Gig-economy delivery sits on the shakiest legal ground of the three. The state insurance laws that require rideshare companies to carry $1 million in liability coverage were written for apps that move passengers, not packages. California's version defines a transportation network company as one that connects passengers with drivers, and separately sets $1 million in primary coverage from the moment a driver accepts a ride until it ends, with a lower floor of $50,000 per person, $100,000 per incident, and $30,000 for property damage while a driver is merely logged in and waiting for a request.15 Food and package delivery apps often aren't transportation network companies under that kind of definition at all, so the mandate doesn't automatically reach them.
There's a reason platforms fill that gap voluntarily: a driver's own personal auto policy usually won't. California's insurance regulator has stated plainly that personal automobile policies do not typically provide coverage for vehicles used for commercial purposes, a gap regulators had to address directly to keep essential delivery drivers insured during the pandemic.16 Insurers routinely check delivery-app data after a crash to see whether a driver was logged in and working, and a driver who never disclosed the gig work to their personal insurer can find that claim denied outright. That's why a platform's contingent coverage often ends up doing the real work in a delivery-driver crash, not the driver's own policy.
DoorDash, for instance, states that it provides up to $1 million in third-party liability coverage once a Dasher accepts a delivery, with no enrollment or premium required.17 Instacart's shoppers, by contrast, are generally expected to carry their own auto policy, with the platform's own coverage filling in only around the edges. The gap most likely to catch an injured person off guard is the time before a delivery is accepted, when a driver is simply logged into the app and waiting.
States are starting to legislate around this patchwork rather than leave it to each platform's terms of service. California's AB 375, effective March 1, 2025, now requires food delivery platforms to show customers the driver's first name and photo before an order arrives, a response to crashes and crimes tied to shared or stolen delivery accounts; a platform that ignores its own verification duties can face a direct negligence claim over that failure.18 Most states don't yet have anything like it.
Who can actually be sued
When a driver is a genuine employee, the employer is usually liable for a crash within the scope of the job under the ordinary doctrine of respondeat superior, which is why FedEx Express is a more straightforward defendant than FedEx Ground, whose driver works for an ISP instead. Independent contractor status doesn't end the inquiry. Courts have long recognized negligent entrustment, the idea that a company handing over a vehicle or a driving job to someone it knew or should have known was unsafe can be liable on its own account, separate from anything the driver did behind the wheel.19 The same reasoning supports negligent hiring and negligent supervision claims against a DSP, an ISP, or a delivery platform that kept using a driver after repeated speeding complaints and at-fault crashes. Telematics and route data that Amazon and FedEx already collect on their own drivers often becomes the evidence for exactly that kind of claim. Because of the coverage gaps described above, a delivery-crash claim often has to draw from more than one policy at once: the driver's personal auto coverage first, the platform's or contractor's commercial or contingent policy second, and an underinsured-motorist claim against your own policy if those layers run out before your medical bills do.
The evidence disappears fast
Delivery-vehicle cases are often won or lost on data that doesn't stick around. Any vehicle with a factory airbag system carries an event data recorder that locks its crash data automatically once the airbags deploy, but non-deployment events can be overwritten by later trips, and the recorded data legally belongs to the vehicle's owner, not the crash victim.20 The delivery platform itself holds another layer of records: GPS pings showing where the driver's phone was at the time of the crash, and timestamps showing whether a delivery was active at that moment. All of it sits on a retention schedule that has nothing to do with your claim, so it can be deleted on a routine cycle long before a lawsuit gets filed. A written request to preserve this data, sent to the DSP, ISP, or platform promptly, can be the difference between getting it and being told it's already gone.
Identifying the vehicle matters too. Any commercial motor vehicle over 10,001 pounds must display a USDOT number on both sides in letters legible from 50 feet away, along with the name of the carrier operating it.21 Lighter delivery vans aren't required to carry that marking, so a photo of the company logo, license plate, and any route number visible on the van is often the only way to trace which contractor was actually behind the wheel. Once you know the carrier, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's National Consumer Complaint Database lets anyone file a report about unsafe driving; it won't get you compensation, but it builds the record regulators use to decide who gets investigated.22
What still depends on your state
A handful of variables in every one of these cases come down to which state the crash happened in: how long you have to file suit, whether your own share of fault reduces or bars your recovery entirely, what minimum insurance the at-fault driver's personal policy had to carry, and whether that state has extended any rideshare-style insurance mandate to delivery apps at all. Those specifics are covered on this site's state-by-state pages.
Getting help sorting out who pays
Between contractor entities, corporate insurance policies, platform coverage, and the driver's own policy, figuring out who actually pays after one of these crashes is rarely simple. An attorney who has handled delivery-vehicle claims before will know which entity to notify first and how to request telematics data before it's overwritten. You can find one through this site's legal directory.
This is general information, not legal advice.
Sources
-
U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales, 4th Quarter 2025: https://www2.census.gov/retail/releases/historical/ecomm/25q4.pdf
-
49 CFR 390.5, Definitions (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations), eCFR: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-390/subpart-B/section-390.5
-
InsideEVs, "Everything We Know About The Rivian Electric Delivery Van (EDV)": https://insideevs.com/news/539567/rivian-edv-electric-delivery-van/
-
49 CFR 383.5, Definitions (Commercial Driver's License Standards), eCFR: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-383
-
49 CFR Part 382, Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing, eCFR: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-382
-
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries in 2024: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf
-
FMCSA, Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts (NHTSA FARS data): https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety/data-and-statistics/large-truck-and-bus-crash-facts
-
Swingle Collins & Associates, "Insurance for Amazon Delivery Service Providers (DSP)": https://www.swinglecollins.com/news-insights/insurance-for-amazon-delivery-service-providers-dsp
-
Insureon, "Amazon Flex Driver Insurance": https://www.insureon.com/delivery-services-business-insurance/amazon-flex-drivers
-
Amazon, "Everything you need to know about Amazon's electric delivery vans from Rivian": https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/transportation/everything-you-need-to-know-about-amazons-electric-delivery-vans-from-rivian
-
CNBC, "Amazon is using AI-equipped cameras in delivery vans and some drivers are concerned about privacy": https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/03/amazon-using-ai-equipped-cameras-in-delivery-vans.html
-
Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 765 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2014): https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16282080975593758278
-
Transport Topics, "FedEx Settles Independent Contractor Suit for $228 Million": https://www.ttnews.com/articles/fedex-settles-contractor-suit-228-million
-
Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018), Justia: https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2018/s222732.html
-
Cal. Public Utilities Code §§ 5431, 5433, Justia: https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-puc/division-2/chapter-8/article-7/section-5433/
-
California Department of Insurance, News Release 037-2020: https://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/2020/release037-2020.cfm
-
DoorDash, "Insurance Basics for Delivery Drivers": https://dasher.doordash.com/en-us/about/insurance
-
Cal. Business and Professions Code § 22599.3 (AB 375, Ch. 84, Statutes of 2024), California Legislative Information: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB375
-
Duke Law Journal, "The Negligent Commercial Transaction Tort: Imposing Common Law Duties" (discussing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 308 and negligent entrustment): https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3047&context=dlj
-
49 CFR Part 563, Event Data Recorders, eCFR: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-V/part-563
-
49 CFR 390.21, Marking of self-propelled CMVs and intermodal equipment, eCFR: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-390/subpart-B/section-390.21
-
FMCSA, National Consumer Complaint Database: https://nccdb.fmcsa.dot.gov/nccdb/home.aspx