Ancient and Folk Traditions of Spinal Manipulation

Spinal manipulation is a therapeutic intervention involving the application of controlled forces to spinal joints to restore mobility and alleviate pain ¹. The practice has a history extending deep into antiquity, long before its formalization within modern health professions like chiropractic ². One of the oldest medical texts discussing the spine, the Edwin Smith Papyrus from ancient Egypt (c. 1600 BCE), describes vertebral dislocations and crushes, though it primarily offers a diagnostic framework and advises against intervention in severe cases ³. In ancient Greece, Hippocrates (c. 460-370 BCE) systemized mechanical approaches for spinal reduction in his treatise On Joints ⁴. He detailed the use of devices like the scamnum, or Hippocratic board, which employed traction with ropes and pulleys to correct spinal curvatures ⁵⁴. Another described method was succussion, where a patient with a spinal hump (gibbus) was secured to a ladder and shaken, using gravity to apply corrective force ⁶⁷.⁸

Centuries later, the Roman physician Galen (c. 130-210 CE) documented a case connecting spinal injury to neurological deficit. He reported treating a patient named Pausanias for sensory loss in his fingers by applying medication to the C-7 vertebral level, which he believed was the site of the injury, resulting in a full recovery ⁹¹⁰. This Greco-Roman knowledge was preserved and expanded during the Islamic Golden Age by figures such as Al-Zahrawi (936-1013 CE), whose encyclopedia Al-Tasrif illustrated orthopedic instruments and reinforced the importance of anatomical principles derived from Hippocrates ¹¹. Parallel to these formal medical traditions, empirical manipulative practices developed globally. In Mexico, traditional healers known as hueseros (bone setters) and sobadores (manipulators) treat musculoskeletal ailments using massage and manipulation ¹². In the Philippines, the practice of Hilot incorporates spinal mobilization to address joint stiffness ¹³.

In Europe, the tradition of bonesetting was carried on by practitioners who often lacked formal medical training. The 18th-century English bonesetter Sarah Mapp was noted for her physical strength and bold techniques ¹⁴, a lineage that continued with figures like the 20th-century manipulative surgeon Sir Herbert Barker ¹⁵. This informal history of bonesetting directly influenced the codification of chiropractic in the late 19th century by Daniel David Palmer ¹⁶.¹⁷ The principles Palmer developed drew from the empirical successes of these folk practitioners ¹⁸. This article examines the evolution of spinal manipulation from these ancient and folk traditions, tracing their diagnostic and therapeutic concepts and their eventual integration into modern chiropractic ¹⁹ and manual medicine, as exemplified by the work of clinicians like Karel Lewit of the Prague School ²⁰.

Pre-Hippocratic and early evidence (c. 34,100 BCE, c. 1600 BCE)

The history of human interaction with spinal injury extends deep into prehistory, predating any known medical texts. The earliest known physical evidence of severe spinal trauma in a modern human was identified in a 34,100-year-old skeleton from the Upper Paleolithic period. A 2004 analysis of these remains revealed a healed compression fracture of a lumbar vertebra, representing the oldest known prehistoric spine fracture ²¹. The fact that the individual survived this significant injury demonstrates a capacity for recovery from spinal trauma in the prehistoric era, although the record provides no evidence of specific therapeutic interventions. This archaeological finding establishes the ancient origins of the types of spinal column injuries that later practitioners would attempt to diagnose and treat.

The first documented clinical approach to spinal injury appears thousands of years later in ancient Egypt, captured in the Edwin Smith Papyrus. Dated to approximately 1600 BCE, this text is considered a copy of an older work and stands as the oldest known surgical document on trauma. A clinical reappraisal of the papyrus by van Middendorp, Sanchez, and Burridge confirmed its rational, evidence-based approach, which was devoid of magical or religious explanations for injury ³. The document presents 48 cases of trauma organized by anatomical location. Several cases specifically describe injuries to the vertebrae of the neck, including detailed observations of dislocation, sprains, and crushed vertebrae. The physician is instructed to perform a physical examination, noting crepitus (a grinding sound) and the alignment of the vertebrae.

Crucially, the papyrus highlights a diagnostic and prognostic, rather than a manipulative, approach to severe spinal injuries. It establishes a triage system, classifying conditions as “an ailment I will treat,” “an ailment with which I will contend,” or “an ailment not to be treated.” Cases involving severe cervical spine trauma with associated neurological deficits, such as quadriplegia, were placed in the last category ³. For these patients, the physician was advised against active intervention, a recommendation based on empirical observation of poor outcomes. This demonstrates a sophisticated level of clinical judgment, prioritizing an accurate diagnosis and prognosis over futile attempts at treatment. While prehistoric evidence shows survival from spinal fracture was possible ²¹, the Edwin Smith Papyrus provides the first clear textual evidence of a systematic, non-interventionist approach to catastrophic spinal injury, forming the earliest foundation of spinal assessment in recorded history ³.

Greco-Roman foundations (c. 460 BCE, c. 210 CE)

The conservative approach to severe spinal trauma seen in ancient Egypt contrasts with the active, mechanical interventions developed in classical Greece. Hippocrates of Kos (c. 460, c. 370 BCE) documented systematic methods for the reduction of spinal deformities and dislocations. His treatise 'On Joints' details the use of a specialized device known as the Hippocratic scamnum, or bench ⁴. This apparatus was a traction table upon which a patient was secured with straps ⁵. A physician or assistant would then apply force using a system of ropes, winches, and pulleys to achieve gradual spinal extension, aiming to reduce curvatures and set vertebral fractures ⁵. Hippocrates asserted that with the proper application of the scamnum, no joint was incapable of being reduced ⁴. The techniques described in his works, including On the Articulations, established a foundation for orthopedic manipulation that persisted for centuries.

A more forceful technique described by Hippocrates was succussion, which involved the use of the Hippocratic ladder ⁷. For this procedure, a patient with a prominent spinal hump, or gibbus, was firmly tied to a ladder ⁶, ⁷. The ladder was then hoisted upright and shaken vigorously, sometimes by being dropped short distances. The combination of gravity and the jarring motion was intended to apply a strong corrective force to the spinal curvature ⁶. These methods, while rudimentary and forceful by modern standards, represent one of the earliest recorded attempts to use mechanical principles for spinal correction ⁵.

Later, in the Roman Empire, the physician Galen of Pergamon (c. 129, c. 210 CE) advanced the understanding of spinal pathology beyond simple mechanics to include its neurological consequences. Galen documented a case study of a prominent sophist named Pausanias, who had suffered a fall and subsequently developed paresis and sensory loss, specifically numbness, in the little and ring fingers of his left hand ⁹, ¹⁰. By carefully examining the patient, Galen localized the injury to the patient's back and theorized that the symptoms stemmed from trauma to a spinal nerve root at the level of the seventh cervical vertebra (C-7) ⁹. He reported treating Pausanias not with manipulation but by applying specific medications to the skin over the site of the spinal injury ¹⁰. Galen documented a full recovery of sensation and function for Pausanias, providing an early and influential clinical account linking a specific spinal level to peripheral nerve function ⁹, ¹⁰. This diagnostic insight marked a significant step in the history of spinal medicine.

The Middle Ages and the Islamic Golden Age (c. 936 CE, c. 1500 CE)

Following the decline of the Western Roman Empire, the sophisticated orthopedic knowledge of the Greco-Roman world was largely preserved and advanced by physicians in the Islamic Golden Age. Scholars in centers of learning like Córdoba, Baghdad, and Damascus translated Greek medical texts into Arabic, ensuring the continuity of the Hippocratic and Galenic traditions. A central figure in this transmission was the Andalusian physician Abū al-Qāsim al-Zahrāwī (c. 936-1013 CE), known in the West as Albucasis. His thirty-volume medical encyclopedia, the Kitab al-Tasrif (The Method of Medicine), became a foundational surgical text in Europe for over five hundred years following its translation into Latin.

The surgical volume of the Al-Tasrif is a landmark in the history of medicine, providing detailed descriptions and one of the earliest systematic visual catalogs of surgical instruments, including those for orthopedic procedures ¹¹. Al-Zahrawi meticulously documented methods for treating spinal injuries and deformities that built directly upon the work of Hippocrates. He described the reduction of a dislocated vertebra using a controlled form of traction, a clear evolution of the principles behind the Hippocratic board, or scamnum ⁵, ⁴. This device, as described in classical texts, secured the patient and used mechanical force via ropes and pulleys to reduce spinal curvatures ⁵. Al-Zahrawi’s text also explained the careful application of force for reducing spinal fractures, adapting the concepts that Hippocrates had employed with devices like the succussion ladder, which used gravity and shaking to correct spinal humps ⁶, ⁷.

However, Al-Zahrawi’s contribution was not simply the preservation of older techniques. He consistently emphasized the critical importance of a thorough understanding of anatomy before attempting any surgical or manipulative intervention, a core tenet derived directly from Hippocratic principles ¹¹. This insistence on a scientific foundation, linking anatomical knowledge to clinical practice, represented a significant intellectual step. By codifying, illustrating, and refining the manipulative techniques of the classical world, Al-Zahrawi and other physicians of the era ensured that the diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge of spinal care was systematically organized and transmitted. This body of work formed a critical bridge, preserving ancient traditions and laying the groundwork for the later resurgence of anatomical study and manual medicine in Renaissance Europe.

European folk traditions and the rise of bonesetters (c. 1600s, early 1900s)

Parallel to the scholarly medical traditions of Europe, a vibrant and enduring lineage of folk practice known as bonesetting flourished from the 17th to the early 20th centuries. These practitioners, often from families where skills were passed down empirically through generations, operated outside the formal medical establishment. Their approach was based on practical application and observable results rather than on academic anatomical training. The 18th-century English bonesetter Sarah Mapp, known as "Crazy Sally," exemplified this tradition. Mapp was renowned not for her knowledge of anatomy but for the formidable strength of her arms and her direct, forceful manipulations, which she described as "bold undertakings" ¹⁴. Despite ridicule from the medical elite, she attracted large crowds of patients, including those who had found no relief from conventional physicians.

Bonesetters represented a distinct manual therapy tradition that persisted due to its perceived efficacy in treating dislocations, fractures, and joint complaints. This empirical lineage provided a foundation for later developments in manual medicine. Sir Herbert Barker, a prominent manipulative surgeon of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, represented a transitional figure who sought to elevate the status of these techniques. Though he lacked formal medical qualifications, Barker's success earned him a knighthood, and he documented his methods and philosophy in his 1927 autobiography, Leaves from My Life ¹⁵. He argued for the legitimacy of manipulative therapy based on its clinical outcomes.

The influence of this established, non-academic practice was significant in the development of modern manual therapies. Research suggests that the principles of chiropractic as formulated by D.D. Palmer were directly shaped by the hands-on, empirical traditions of 19th-century American bonesetters ¹⁸. This connection is a central theme in the historiography of the profession, as detailed in works like J. Stuart Moore's Chiropractic in America [16]. The integration of folk medicine techniques into modern clinical frameworks continued into the 20th century, notably by figures like Karel Lewit, who incorporated such manual methods into the Prague School of Manual Medicine, valuing their diagnostic and therapeutic utility ²⁰. The bonesetter's legacy, therefore, represents a critical, practical antecedent to the codified systems of chiropractic and osteopathy.

Global folk healing traditions (Antiquity to present)

Parallel to the development of bonesetting in Europe and North America, distinct systems of manual therapy emerged and have been sustained in other parts of the world, providing a broader context for the human practice of spinal manipulation. In Mexico and within Mexican diaspora populations, traditional healers known as 'hueseros' (bone setters) and 'sobadores' (manipulative therapists) have long addressed musculoskeletal complaints ¹². These practitioners employ a combination of massage and direct manipulation to treat physical ailments ¹². The persistence and migration of these practices are evidenced by a 2015 study from Arcury, et al., which documented the work of sobadores within a new settlement community in the United States, where they continue to serve as primary points of care for musculoskeletal issues ¹². The work of hueseros and sobadores is learned through apprenticeship and is deeply embedded in community life, representing an empirical tradition focused on functional outcomes.

A similar tradition exists in the Philippines, where 'Hilot' is a well-established form of indigenous healing ¹³. While widely known as a type of massage, Hilot also encompasses specific manipulative techniques. The practice may include spinal manipulation (SMT), joint mobilization, and soft tissue therapy intended to restore joint mobility and reduce stiffness ¹³. As an example, the 'palagatok' adjustment is a specific manipulative procedure used to address lower back pain ¹³. Like its Mexican counterparts, Hilot is a holistic system, with knowledge traditionally passed from one generation of practitioners to the next.

These global folk traditions developed independently, yet they share a common foundation with the Western bonesetting that preceded formal chiropractic: an empirical discovery of the therapeutic value of hands-on manipulation. While specific techniques like the 'palagatok' adjustment bear a functional resemblance to modern SMT ¹³, the underlying explanatory models differ significantly from the biomechanical and neurological principles central to chiropractic. As documented by Gatterman and Meeker, chiropractic's founders drew from a bonesetting tradition that was itself becoming medicalized ¹⁸, a process detailed in historical accounts of professionalization like A History of Chiropractic Education in North America [17]. In contrast, practitioners like the hueseros focus on treating musculoskeletal problems through massage and manipulation without necessarily invoking the specific vertebral subluxation concepts central to historical chiropractic theory ¹², as articulated by D.D. Palmer [18]. These parallel systems demonstrate a widespread, cross-cultural recognition of the benefits of manual therapies for musculoskeletal health.

The formalization of manipulative therapy: Chiropractic and osteopathy (1870s, 1920s)

The late 19th-century American medical landscape provided fertile ground for the codification of manual healing practices into new, formalized professions. The two most prominent to emerge from this period were osteopathy and chiropractic, both of which drew upon the long-standing tradition of bonesetting. The historical work Chiropractic in America documents this era of medical pluralism, where alternative theories could gain a foothold ¹⁶. While osteopathy was founded first by physician Andrew Taylor Still in 1874, chiropractic followed two decades later with a distinct philosophical and clinical focus.

Daniel David (D.D.) Palmer, a magnetic healer with an interest in various health philosophies, established the principles of chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa. His approach was directly influenced by the empirical, hands-on methods of 19th-century bonesetters, who practiced without a unifying theory but often achieved notable results ¹⁸. Palmer sought to create a scientific and philosophical framework for these manipulative techniques. The foundational event occurred in 1895, when Palmer performed what he termed the first chiropractic "adjustment" on a building custodian, Harvey Lillard, who reportedly regained his hearing after a specific spinal manipulation.

From this experience, Palmer developed his central theory of the vertebral subluxation. He posited that a displaced vertebra could impinge on spinal nerves, interfering with the body’s innate intelligence and causing disease. He articulated this concept in his 1910 book, The Chiropractor, distinguishing his system from both medicine and the broader bonesetting arts ²². To propagate his teachings, he founded the Palmer School of Chiropractic in 1897, the first institution of its kind. The history of the Palmer family and the school's development is chronicled in the book Three Generations: A History of Chiropractic ²³. This step marked a definitive shift from an individual’s practice to a structured profession with a curriculum, a distinct lexicon, and a theoretical basis for its manipulative procedures. The early development and struggles of the new profession are a frequent subject in the Journal of the Association for the History of Chiropractic ². By formalizing training and theory, Palmer and his successors established a new branch of health care rooted in ancient manipulative traditions but defined by its specific focus on the spine and nervous system.

Modern integration and scientific inquiry (Mid-20th century to present)

The mid-20th century initiated a significant movement to integrate manual therapies into mainstream clinical science, moving beyond the empirical traditions of bonesetting and early chiropractic. This period saw a concerted effort to analyze, systematize, and scientifically validate techniques that had long existed in folk medicine. A prominent example of this synthesis occurred in Europe with the Prague School of Manual Medicine and Rehabilitation. Led by neurologists such as Karel Lewit and Vladimir Janda, this institution actively integrated manual techniques derived from folk medicine into a modern clinical and neurophysiological framework ²⁰. Lewit and his colleagues did not dismiss these traditional methods but instead sought to understand their diagnostic and therapeutic utility, applying principles of functional anatomy and pathophysiology. The Prague School's emphasis on a functional diagnosis, aimed at identifying and treating reversible joint dysfunctions and associated soft tissue changes, provided a clinical model that resonated with similar developments in chiropractic and osteopathy.

Concurrently, the chiropractic profession in North America was undergoing its own process of maturation, marked by a drive toward educational standardization and technical codification. As the profession grew beyond its charismatic founders, so did the need to establish a consistent, teachable curriculum for its expanding network of colleges. This effort, documented in historical reports to accrediting bodies like the Council on Chiropractic Education, involved formalizing the curriculum, faculty standards, and clinical training requirements across institutions ¹⁹. Central to this evolution was the development and documentation of standardized techniques, which aimed to ensure patient safety, clinical consistency, and professional identity.

The creation of detailed textbooks became a primary vehicle for this process, transforming manipulative procedures from an imparted art into a documented science. Texts such as F. P. DeGiacomo's Textbook of Chiropractic Technique from 1981 provided systematic, illustrated descriptions of specific spinal adjustments, including patient and doctor positioning, lines of drive, and precise contact points for various named techniques ²⁴. This codification was essential for both teaching and interprofessional communication. Later works, including the widely used Chiropractic Technique by Thomas F. Bergmann and David H. Peterson, continued this tradition with even greater detail, incorporating biomechanical principles, physiological rationales, and evidence from emerging clinical research ¹. The standardization of these procedures was a prerequisite for rigorous scientific inquiry. It allowed researchers to design trials with reproducible interventions to test the efficacy, safety, and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of spinal manipulation, laying the groundwork for the evidence-based approach that increasingly defines modern manual therapy practice.

Sources

1. Chiropractic Technique - E-Book: Chiropractic Technique - E-Book by Thomas F. Bergmann, David H. Peterson (2010, Elsevier Health Sciences) - https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=GU5tLPXB4GgC

2. Chiropractic History: The Archives and Journal of the Association for the History of Chiropractic (1987) - https://books.google.com/books/about/Chiropractic_History.html?hl=&id=Uw5OAQAAIAAJ

3. van Middendorp, J. J., Sanchez, G. M., & Burridge, A. L. (2010). The Edwin Smith papyrus: a clinical reappraisal of the oldest known document on spinal injuries. - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989268/

4. Tsoucalas G, et al., The Spine Journal (2012) - https://www.thespinejournalonline.com/article/S1529-9430(12)00407-3/fulltext

5. Androutsos G, et al., Historical Review: The evolution of the treatment of spinal deformities from the ancient times to the modern era (2011) - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221915993_The_evolution_of_the_treatment_of_spinal_deformities_from_the_ancient_times_to_the_modern_era

6. Hippocrates, On the Articulations - https://classics.mit.edu/Hippocrates/artic.42.42.html

7. G.P. G., et al., Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (2005) - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7811902_Spinal_deformities_in_ancient_Greece

8. Eiler H. Schiøtz, Manipulation treatment of the spinal column from the medical-historical viewpoint (1958) - https://openlibrary.org/works/OL11214062W

9. Marketos, S. G., Androutsos, G. P., & Diamantopoulos, A. A. (1998). Paresis of the hand due to a spinal injury, as described by Galen. - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9519507/

10. S. G. Marketos & P. K. Skiadas, Spine (1999) - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10562306/

11. El-Gawad, M.A.A., Journal of the Medical Library Association (2024) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016839/

12. Arcury, T. A., et al. (2015). The work of sobadores in a new settlement community in the United States. - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562388/

13. Facebook, Legit Hilot Palagatok adjustment for lower back pain - https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=969566997415494

14. Phillips, S.A. & Biant, L.C., The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2011) - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279854743_The_demise_of_the_bonesetter_in_18th_and_19th_century_Great_Britain

15. Sir Herbert Barker, Leaves from My Life (1927) - https://www.abebooks.com/LEAVES-LIFE-Reminiscences-famous-Manipulative-Sir/30554316654/bd

16. Chiropractic in America: The History of a Medical Alternative by J. Stuart Moore (1993) - https://books.google.com/books/about/Chiropractic_in_America.html?hl=&id=DSNtAAAAMAAJ

17. David Chapman-Smith, The chiropractic profession (2000) - https://openlibrary.org/works/OL13383075W

18. Gatterman, M. I., & Meeker, W. C., Chiropractic & Osteopathy (2005) - https://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1746-1340-13-16

19. A History of Chiropractic Education in North America: Report to the Council on Chiropractic Education by Joseph C. Keating, Alana K. Callender, Carl Service Cleveland (1998) - https://books.google.com/books/about/A_History_of_Chiropractic_Education_in_N.html?hl=&id=w4PVAAAACAAJ

20. Lewit, K., Manipulative Therapy in Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System (3rd ed.), 1999 - https://www.google.com/books/edition/Manipulative_Therapy_in_Rehabilitation/w-T0QgAACAAJ

21. Weber J, et al. (2004). Lumbar spine fracture in a 34,100-year-old skeleton: the oldest known prehistoric spine fracture. - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15335439/

22. The Chiropractor (Classic Reprint) by Daniel David Palmer (2018, Forgotten Books) - https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Chiropractor_Classic_Reprint.html?hl=&id=alw1vAEACAAJ

23. Three Generations: A History of Chiropractic by David D. Palmer, David W. Palmer (1967) - https://books.google.com/books/about/Three_Generations.html?hl=&id=DaWrGAAACAAJ

24. Textbook of Chiropractic Technique by F. P. DeGiacomo (1981) - https://books.google.com/books/about/Textbook_of_Chiropractic_Technique.html?hl=&id=0QGtAAAACAAJ