Case Result

$300,000

Psychiatric Malpractice

1996
Red Bank, NJ

Case results are sourced directly from attorney websites by Injuria.ai's data infrastructure, which actively monitors 22,000+ personal injury law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Case Details

Psychiatric Malpractice - Negligence occurs in 1970s - Condition of Alexithymia allegedly precludes plaintiff from ascertaining potential fault of defendant - Case settles prior to hearing on motion to dismiss for failure to file within Statute of Limitations.

Additional Notes

The female plaintiff in her early 40s at the time of the recovery had been treated for depression by the defendant psychiatrist from 1970-1973. The plaintiff contended that the defendant took advantage of the patient’s dependency, isolating her and improperly coercing her into undergoing several injections of Sodium Pentothal, which created a hypnotic state. The plaintiff could not describe any untoward events that occurred during such states. The plaintiff also contended that the defendant took advantage of her by advising her to partially disrobe on several occasions and by conducting an internal examination, advising her that he could thereby determine if she were pregnant. The plaintiff contended that she suffered an aggravation of her depression and a post-traumatic stress disorder, which caused heightened anxiety and depression. The defendant had no recollection of the plaintiff. The defendant also contended that the action should be barred by the Statue of Limitations. The plaintiff’s currently treating psychiatrist contended that the plaintiff suffered from a psychiatric condition known as Alexithymia, which entailed a predisposition to blame oneself for injuries caused by others. The psychiatrist contended that the condition was very significant and prevented the plaintiff from realizing that the defendant, whom she had idolized, had harmed her until shortly before the action was brought. The plaintiff maintained that although improved, she will permanently suffer the effects of the aggravation to some degree. The defendant’s insurance policy did not contain a clause limiting damages in sexual contact cases to an amount less than the policy limits. The insurance company was, however, defending the case with a reservation. It should be noted that the defendant had filed bankruptcy and that all claims for intentional tort had been voluntarily dismissed. Attorney for plaintiff: Frank S. Gaudio of The Law Office of Miller & Gaudio PC in Red Bank.

More Results from The Law Office of Miller & Gaudio PC

Red Bank, NJ
4.50 rating
2 attorneys
View Firm Profile

Top Rated Personal Injury Law Firms in Red Bank, NJ

Compare firms ranked by Google Reviews.

View Top Rated Firms