Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin
1829 Reisterstown Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21208, Baltimore, MD 21208
About Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Moore & Quinn is a personal injury law firm founded in 1945. Based in Baltimore, Maryland, the firm represents individuals and families across Maryland and Washington D.C. They handle cases including medical negligence, product liability, and car accidents. The firm, with six attorneys, does not represent insurance companies or corporations. They have secured significant verdicts and settlements, including a $59.7 million verdict, and one attorney is also a pharmacist.
Our Attorneys
Notable Case Results
Case results are sourced directly from attorney websites by Injuria.ai's data infrastructure, which actively monitors 22,000+ personal injury law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms.
$15M
Medical Malpractice
Settlement for a 36 year old physician whose systemic bacterial infection was not timely diagnosed and treated, leaving him with multiple amputations, severe hearing loss, multi-organ failure and multiple subsequent surgeries.
$8M
Automobile Collisions
Settlement for individual who became quadriplegic following the negligent operation of a motor vehicle by a bus driver who ran into a concrete abutment.
$6.5M
Medical Malpractice
Settlement in a case involving a failure to diagnose an epidural abscess, resulting in tetraplegia.
$5.7M
Medical Malpractice
Recovery for catastrophic birth injuries resulting in negligent administration of anesthesia.
$5.6M
Medical Malpractice
Settlement in a case involving failure to continuously monitor a patient’s cardiac and respiratory status, leading to a delayed discovery of brain hemorrhage, resulting in the patient becoming permanent brain injured.
$3.3M
Products Liability
Federal jury awarded an Illinois couple $3.27 million in a transvaginal mesh case. The plaintiff suffered from stress urinary incontinence and had a Johnson & Johnson transvaginal mesh sling implanted, which later had to be removed due to pelvic pain and pain during sexual intercourse. The suit alleged defective design and failure to warn about erosion risks.