Berger Kahn

Berger Kahn

25910 Acero, Suite 242, Mission Viejo, California 92691, Mission Viejo, CA 92691

3 Locations
$15.8B+ Recovered
Visit Website

About Berger Kahn

Berger Kahn is a California law firm with offices in Mission Viejo, Lake Forest, and San Diego. The firm represents clients in serious personal injury, wrongful death, insurance bad faith, and subrogation matters. With over 50 years in practice, the firm has secured substantial recoveries, including multi-billion dollar settlements in wildfire subrogation cases. Berger Kahn serves clients across California and nationwide.

Notable Case Results

Case results are sourced directly from attorney websites by Injuria.ai's data infrastructure, which actively monitors 22,000+ personal injury law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms.

$11B

Subrogation

Global bankruptcy resolution between PG&E and subrogation carriers for wildfire cases (North Bay and Camp fires).

$2.2B

Subrogation

Southern California Edison settled insurance claims from the 2018 Woolsey fire. The agreement covers all claims in pending lawsuits from insurance companies. Craig Simon served as Co-Lead Counsel for subrogation plaintiffs.

2021View

$1.6B

Subrogation

Settlement for the 2017 Thomas Fire against Southern California Edison.

2021View

$950M

Subrogation

Settlement involving California wildfire-related cases on behalf of homeowner insurance carriers in the San Diego Fire Cases.

$69.5M

Subrogation

Lawsuit arising from the historic 2008 Freeway Complex Fire, with a judgment awarding a group of homeowners and subrogating insurers more than $69 million. Berger Kahn’s clients were awarded $9.2 million of the total verdict. The case was tried before a retired Justice.

2012Trial VerdictView

$1M

Insurance Coverage

Defense verdict in a federal court lawsuit seeking $1M in insurance policy benefits, where the insured’s claim was denied due to intentional material misrepresentations regarding a suspicious business fire.

2021Trial VerdictView

Office Locations