Erickson, Zierke, Kuderer & Madsen, P.A
7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 207 Minneapolis, MN 55439, Minneapolis, MN 55439
About Erickson, Zierke, Kuderer & Madsen, P.A
Erickson, Zierke, Kuderer & Madsen, P.A. provides legal services in civil litigation, personal injury, real estate, and estate planning. The firm has served individuals and companies for over 90 years. With eight attorneys, it operates from offices in Fairmont and Minneapolis, Minnesota, extending services to neighboring states. Free case evaluations are available.
Our Attorneys
Gregory E. Kuderer
43+ years experience
Robert E. Kuderer
34+ years experience
Paul S. Hopewell
Shareholder
28+ years experience
Matthew M. Johnson
27+ years experience
Darin G. Haugen
26+ years experience
Thomas C. Brock
10+ years experience
Lauren M. Rossitto
1+ years experience
Taylor M. Thompson
Associate Attorney
Notable Case Results
Case results are sourced directly from attorney websites by Injuria.ai's data infrastructure, which actively monitors 22,000+ personal injury law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms.
$2M
Insurance Coverage
A Minnesota federal court granted equitable contribution to an excess insurer against a primary insurer for amounts paid on behalf of their mutual insured in a settlement involving defective design and construction of grain silos.
$2M
Insurance Coverage
Minnesota Supreme Court ruled on the “your work” exclusion in a standard CGL policy and set forth the rule on Miller-Shugart settlement allocations, concluding that damages need not be allocated for a Miller-Shugart settlement agreement to be reasonable in cases involving a single defendant.
$1.4M
Insurance Coverage
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held an insurer owed a duty to defend and indemnify for a loss arising out of an instant milk recall, finding it was an 'occurrence' and resulted in 'property damage'.
$1.3M
Insurance Coverage
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that entering a Miller-Shugart agreement after a Drake-Ryan agreement breaches the cooperation clause of the umbrella policy, voiding coverage.
$1M
Insurance Coverage
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a jury verdict of over $1,000,000 in a food product recall and insurance coverage case, clarifying the meaning of 'may likely result' in a food product contamination policy.
$485,000
Insurance Coverage
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled a bank was entitled to bond coverage for cyber theft of $485,000, despite employees' failure to follow security procedures, due to the bond's language and Minnesota's concurrent-cause doctrine.