DirectoryLaw FirmsMeissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C.
Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C.

Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C.

111 E Kilbourn Ave 19th Floor, Milwaukee, WI 53202, Milwaukee, WI 53202

28 Attorneys
$28M+ Recovered
Visit Website

About Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C.

Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C. is a Milwaukee law firm established in 1848, with over 175 years of service. The firm offers a wide array of legal services, including complex commercial litigation, insurance coverage, and transactional matters. Its practice areas cover business and corporate law, employment disputes, real estate, and estate planning. The firm's 28 attorneys provide legal representation to clients in Milwaukee and surrounding areas.

Notable Case Results

Case results are sourced directly from attorney websites by Injuria.ai's data infrastructure, which actively monitors 22,000+ personal injury law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms.

$13M

Insurance Coverage

Mark Malloy successfully tried an insurance coverage action related to an alleged claim for bodily injury and property damage due to water intrusion causing mold exposure. Plaintiff demanded $13 million at trial. A finding of no duty to defend or indemnify was obtained by post-trial motion.

Trial VerdictView

$10M

Property Damage

Attorney Mark Malloy obtained a defense verdict in a mold case tried before a jury in Milwaukee County. A condominium owner sought over $10 million for property damage and personal injury, alleging negligent maintenance. The jury found the association not negligent and not in breach of duties.

2015Trial VerdictView

$5M

Business & Corporate Disputes

Attorneys Mark D. Malloy and Matthew V. Fisher obtained summary judgment in an Illinois lawsuit. The client, a national distributor, was sued for tortious interference and conspiracy related to its entry into the e-cigarette industry. Damages claimed were future lost profits in excess of $5 million. The court found claims violated the “new business rule” due to speculative damages.

2014View

Office Locations