About Shine Lawyers
Shine Lawyers is an Australian law firm founded in 1976, offering legal services across Australia and New Zealand. The firm focuses on personal injury, class actions, and superannuation and disability insurance claims. Operating on a No Win, No Fee basis for most clients, Shine Lawyers has secured substantial settlements, including a $300 million class action for pelvic mesh implants. The firm was also one of the first law firms globally to be publicly listed.
Notable Case Results
Case results are sourced directly from attorney websites by Injuria.ai's data infrastructure, which actively monitors 22,000+ personal injury law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The results shown are not necessarily representative of all results obtained by these firms.
$300M
Class Action
Class action on behalf of over 11,000 Australian women who suffered severe complications from Johnson & Johnson pelvic mesh implants, alleging failure to properly test devices and downplay risks.
$250M
Class Action
Class action against Johnson & Johnson and DePuy International for alleged defective ASR hip implants causing complications.
$132.7M
Class Action
Class action alleging the Department of Defence negligently allowed toxic chemicals (PFAS) to escape from defence bases, contaminating local environments and negatively impacting properties, land values, and livelihoods.
$105M
Class Action
Settlement against Boston Scientific for women who suffered due to their mesh implants, following the precedent set by the Johnson & Johnson case.
$92.5M
Class Action
Class action against the Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Defence) for PFAS contamination from RAAF Base Tindal, impacting property owners in Katherine for economic loss and diminution in property value.
$50.5M
Class Action
Class action on behalf of First Nations families in the Northern Territory who were forcibly removed from their families as children (Stolen Generations) or were siblings/carers of Removed Children, alleging the Commonwealth owed a duty of care.