If you're a data point in this report, call us.
We'll evaluate whether you have a case. Free, and no pressure.
ThatCarHitMe.com
An Injuria.ai Company
CRASH INTELLIGENCE REPORT · CONNECTICUT, CT · JANUARY 2015
Purpose: Machine-readable JSON endpoint for AI agents, LLMs, researchers, and programmatic consumers. Returns all underlying crash data and AI-generated commentary without HTML.
Authentication: None required. Public endpoint.
GET: https://thatcarhitme.com/api/crash-data/reports/data/connecticut/statewide/january-2015-report
Monthly Traffic Safety Analysis
8,938 CRASHES IN
CONNECTICUT, CT
JANUARY 2015
In January 2015, Connecticut recorded 8,938 traffic crashes, resulting in 16 fatalities and 2,465 injuries. A significant portion of these incidents, nearly 31%, were front-to-rear collisions. The data also indicates that adverse winter road conditions, such as snow and ice, were present in approximately 30% of all crashes during this period.
8,938
Total Crash Events
16
Persons Killed
2,465
Persons Injured
9.3%
Hit-and-Run Rate
Note: "Persons Killed" (16) counts individual fatalities across all crash events. "Fatal" in the severity table below (16) counts crash events where at least one fatality occurred. A single crash can result in multiple fatalities.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Aggregate counts from crash, person, and vehicle records
834
Hit-and-Run Crashes — January 2015
Based on the initial determination of responding officers, 834 crashes were classified as hit-and-run incidents. This represents 9.3% of all crashes recorded during this period. These incidents involve one or more drivers leaving the scene of a collision without providing required information.
Vulnerable Road User Casualties
Of the 16 fatalities recorded, 11 were motor-vehicle occupants and 5 were pedestrians. Motorists also accounted for the vast majority of injuries, with 2,381 individuals injured. Vulnerable road users sustained a significant number of casualties, with 73 pedestrians and 5 cyclists injured. No cyclist fatalities were reported during this period.
5
Pedestrians Killed
0
Cyclists Killed
11
Motorists Killed
0
Other Killed
73
Pedestrians Injured
5
Cyclists Injured
2,381
Motorists Injured
6
Other Injured
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Mode classified from person records (driver/passenger → motorist; pedestrian; bicyclist → cyclist; in-line skater / unspecified → other)
When Crashes Happen
Crash frequencies peaked on Friday, which saw 1,750 incidents, and during the 3 p.m. hour, with 833 crashes. The data shows distinct morning and afternoon commute peaks, with a significant surge in crashes between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m. While a majority of crashes (63.3%) occurred during daylight hours, over a third of incidents (35.6%) happened in dark or low-light conditions.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash date field aggregated by weekday
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash time field aggregated by hour (0-23)
Crash Severity Breakdown
The vast majority of crashes, 79.5%, resulted in no injuries and involved only property damage. Injury-sustaining crashes accounted for 20.3% of the total, distributed among possible (12.1%), minor (7.3%), and serious (0.9%) injury categories. A total of 16 fatal crashes were recorded, which corresponds to 0.2% of all incidents. In this period, the number of fatal crashes matched the total number of persons killed.
Outcome by Severity (Crash Events)
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · KABCO injury classification scale
Severity Distribution (Crash Events)
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Most severe injury per crash record
Road & Environmental Conditions
While a majority of crashes occurred in favorable conditions—53.8% on dry roads, 62.7% in clear weather, and 63.3% in daylight—adverse conditions were a significant factor. Snow or ice was reported on the road surface in 2,666 crashes (29.8% of the total). Similarly, snow, freezing rain, or rain were present in 2,506 incidents (28.0% of the total).
Weather
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Weather condition at time of crash
Lighting
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Lighting condition field
Road Surface
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Road surface condition field
Vehicles & Demographics
Among all persons involved in crashes, the 26-34 age group was the most represented, accounting for 3,332 individuals, followed by the 45-54 age group with 2,937 individuals. Analysis of the 15,823 vehicles involved shows that the most frequent makes were Honda (1,824), Toyota (1,732), and Ford (1,658). These top three makes collectively accounted for a significant portion of the vehicles in reported collisions.
Top Vehicle Makes (15,823 vehicles)
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Vehicle unit records
1,535 persons with unknown or unrecorded age excluded from age chart.
Sex Distribution (19,161 persons with recorded sex)
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events
Speed Limit Zones
Roads with a posted speed limit of 25 mph saw the highest number of crashes, with 2,646 incidents, accounting for 29.6% of the total where speed limit was known. Within this zone, 0.189% of crashes were fatal. The highest fatal crash rates were observed in the 45 mph zone, where 0.915% of its 328 crashes were fatal, and the 65 mph zone, where 0.57% of its 526 crashes were fatal.
Fatal crashes by zone: 1 mph: 1 of 393 (0.254%) · 25 mph: 5 of 2,646 (0.189%) · 30 mph: 1 of 918 (0.109%) · 35 mph: 1 of 1,051 (0.095%) · 40 mph: 1 of 552 (0.181%) · 45 mph: 3 of 328 (0.915%) · 65 mph: 3 of 526 (0.57%) · 99 mph: 1 of 437 (0.229%)
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Posted speed limit at crash location
Top Counties
Crash distribution was heavily concentrated in three of Connecticut's eight counties. Hartford County recorded the most incidents with 2,370 crashes (26.5% of the state total), followed by Fairfield County with 2,323 crashes (26.0%) and New Haven County with 2,287 crashes (25.6%). Together, these three counties accounted for over 78% of all crashes in the state.
Top Counties
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Top Towns
At the municipal level, crash volumes were highest in Connecticut's largest cities. Hartford led with 624 crashes (7.0% of the state total), followed by New Haven with 603 crashes (6.7%) and Stamford with 437 crashes (4.9%). These three cities collectively represented nearly 19% of all crashes statewide during this period.
Top Towns
Showing top 9 of 50 reported. 41 additional (3,792 total) not shown: Middletown, Fairfield, Manchester, Greenwich, Milford, Stratford, Norwalk, East Hartford, West Hartford, North Haven, Trumbull, Groton, Windsor, Newtown, Norwich, Shelton, New Britain, Orange, Westport, Farmington, Glastonbury, Southington, Bethel, Wethersfield, Torrington, Enfield, Cheshire, Vernon, Plainville, Bloomfield, Branford, East Haven, Wilton, Monroe, South Windsor, Berlin, Ridgefield, Darien, Southbury, Windham, Guilford.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Road Class
Among crashes where the roadway functional class was identified, Local roads accounted for the highest number of incidents with 579. Collector roads followed with 553 crashes, and Minor Arterials saw 467 crashes. Limited-access highways, including Interstates (362) and Freeways/Expressways (259), collectively accounted for 621 crashes.
Road Class
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Route System
Analysis of crashes by the route system shows a split between state-maintained and local roadways. State-maintained routes (Interstate, US Route, and State routes) accounted for 4,553 crashes. Local roads were the site of 3,838 crashes, highlighting that a substantial portion of incidents occur on municipally managed roadways.
Route System
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Public vs Private Road
Of the crashes where roadway ownership was recorded, the vast majority (8,159) occurred on public roads. A smaller but notable number of incidents, 310 crashes or 3.7% of the subset, took place on private property such as parking lots, private drives, or within private developments.
Rural vs Urban
In the 2,456 crashes where the location was classified as either urban or rural, the majority (2,055) occurred in urban areas. Rural areas accounted for 401 crashes, representing 16.3% of incidents in this subset. This highlights the concentration of crash events in more densely populated and developed regions.
Rural vs Urban
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Junction Type
The majority of crashes, 6,243 incidents, did not occur at an intersection. However, a significant number of collisions, totaling 2,669 or approximately 30.0% of all crashes, happened at or were related to a junction. The most common intersection types for these crashes were T-intersections (1,299 crashes) and four-way intersections (1,150 crashes).
Junction Type
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Run-off-Road / Fixed-Object Strikes
Among crashes involving a vehicle running off the road and striking a fixed object, the most commonly struck objects were guardrail faces (445 incidents), utility poles or light supports (345), and trees (278). Collisions with utility poles and trees, two of the most dangerous roadside hazards, together accounted for 623 incidents, representing 27.9% of all fixed-object crashes.
Run-off-Road / Fixed-Object Strikes
Showing top 9 of 22 reported. 13 additional (403 total) not shown: Traffic Sign Support, Mailbox, Fence, Ditch, Guardrail End, Other Traffic Barrier, Struck by Falling, Shifting Cargo or Anything Set in Motion by Motor Vehicle, Bridge Rail, Impact Attenuator/Crash Cushion, Traffic Signal Support, Culvert, Bridge Overhead Structure, Bridge Pier or Support.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Vehicle Type
Passenger cars were the most common vehicle type involved in crashes, accounting for 10,127 of the 15,823 vehicles in the dataset. Sport Utility Vehicles (2,729) and Pickup trucks (1,095) were the next most frequent. Notably, 432 medium or heavy trucks, 156 buses of various types, and 7 motorcycles were also involved in collisions.
Vehicle Type
Showing top 9 of 17 reported. 8 additional (89 total) not shown: Transit Bus, Other Bus, Low Speed Vehicle, Motorcycle, Motor Coach, All Terrain Vehicle (ATV), Motor Home, Moped.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Vehicle unit records
Traffic Control Device
In a majority of recorded instances (10,770), no traffic control device was present at the crash location. Locations with a traffic control signal were the second most common site, with 3,432 instances. Stop signs were present in 1,072 instances, indicating that a large share of crashes occur away from complex intersections or on road segments with no active traffic management.
Traffic Control Device
"Other" combines 5 smaller categories (45 records): Warning Sign (21), Marked Uncontrolled Crosswalk (15), Railway Crossing Device (5), School Zone Sign/Device (2), Pedestrian Button (2).
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Vehicle unit records
Vulnerable Road Users & Motorcycles
A total of 90 crashes involved pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorcyclists. Of these, pedestrians were involved in 74 incidents and bicyclists in 10. Combined, these two vulnerable road user groups accounted for 84 crashes, or 93.3% of collisions within this specific subset.
Driver Contributing Action
Among drivers for whom a contributing action was cited, following too closely was the most common error, noted in 2,053 instances, or 28.1% of these cases. The next most frequent actions were failing to keep in the proper lane (1,207 instances) and failing to yield the right-of-way (730 instances). These three actions represent the primary driver errors leading to collisions.
Driver Contributing Action
Showing top 9 of 19 reported. 10 additional (1,151 total) not shown: Operated Motor Vehicle in Inattentive, Careless, Negligent, or Erratic Manner, Over-Correcting/Over-Steering, Ran Red Light, Improper Passing, Ran Stop Sign, Operated Motor Vehicle in Reckless or Aggressive Manner, Wrong Side or Wrong Way, Disregarded Other Traffic Sign, Disregarded Other Road Markings, Overtaking Cyclist.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events
Driver Condition
While most drivers were recorded as 'Apparently Normal,' 506 drivers were noted to have a specific physical or mental condition. The most cited condition was being under the influence of medications, drugs, or alcohol, with 198 drivers. Another 104 drivers were reported as asleep or fatigued, and 81 were noted as being in an emotional state such as anger or distress.
Driver Condition
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events
Pre-Crash Driver Action
Analysis of vehicle actions immediately prior to impact reveals that the majority of vehicles (6,873, or 43.4%) were moving straight ahead. A significant number of vehicles were either stopped in traffic (1,646 vehicles) or parked (1,119 vehicles) when the collision occurred. These actions represent the most common pre-crash movements in the dataset.
Pre-Crash Driver Action
Showing top 9 of 17 reported. 8 additional (1,102 total) not shown: Changing Lanes, Overtaking/Passing, Entering Traffic Lane, Leaving Traffic Lane, Wrong way (or Wrong Side), Making U-Turn, Overtaking/Passing Cyclist, Traveling in Bike Lane.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Vehicle unit records
Point of Impact
The most common point of impact on vehicles was the front, recorded as 'Sector 12 (North)' in 4,629 instances, representing 29.9% of impacts where location was specified. The second most frequent impact point was the rear, 'Sector 6 (South),' which was struck in 2,810 instances. These two locations account for the primary impact points in collisions.
Point of Impact
"Other" combines 9 smaller categories (2,277 records): Sector 9 (West) in the 12-point Clock Diagram (481), Sector 2 (NorthEast) in the 12-point Clock Diagram (456), Sector 3 (East) in the 12-point Clock Diagram (407), Sector 8 (SouthWest) in the 12-point Clock Diagram (352), Sector 4 (SouthEast) in the 12-point Clock Diagram (283), Top (117), Non-Collision (100), Undercarriage (76), Cargo loss (5).
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Vehicle unit records
Pedestrian/Cyclist Action
Among the 88 instances where a pedestrian's action was recorded, 39 were noted as having 'No Improper Action.' For those where an improper action was cited, the most common behaviors were 'Dart/Dash' into the roadway (10 instances), being in the roadway improperly (8 instances), and actions related to a disabled vehicle (7 instances).
Pedestrian/Cyclist Action
Showing top 9 of 12 reported. 3 additional (4 total) not shown: Wrong-Way Riding or Walking, Inattentive (Talking, Eating, etc.), Improper Turn/Merge.
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Non-motorist records linked to crash events
Manner of Collision
Front-to-rear collisions were the most prevalent crash type, accounting for 2,760 incidents or 30.9% of all crashes. Angle collisions were the second most common type, with 1,519 incidents (17.0%). These two patterns together represent nearly half of all crashes with a known collision manner.
Manner of Collision
"Other" combines 1 smaller categories (113 records): Rear to rear (113).
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Person Type
Of the 20,365 individuals involved in crashes, the vast majority were drivers (14,851 persons, or 72.9%). Passengers constituted the second-largest group, with 4,645 individuals (22.8%). A small but notable number of pedestrians (85) and bicyclists (10) were also involved.
Person Type
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Person Injury Severity
Across all 19,683 persons with a known injury status, 17,202 (87.4%) sustained no injuries. A total of 2,465 persons were injured, representing 12.5% of the total, while 16 individuals (0.08%) suffered fatal injuries. The injuries were categorized as possible (1,556), minor (816), and serious (93).
Person Injury Severity
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Occupant Safety Equipment
Among 17,238 vehicle occupants whose safety equipment use was recorded, the vast majority (14,743) were reported as using a shoulder and lap belt. However, 418 individuals, or 2.4% of this group, were recorded as using no restraint system at all. An additional 1,295 were noted as using a restraint of an unknown type.
Occupant Safety Equipment
"Other" combines 3 smaller categories (97 records): Child Restraint System, Rear Facing (43), Booster Seat (31), Child Restraint, Type Unknown (23).
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Person-level records linked to crash events
Vehicles Per Crash
The most common type of crash involved two vehicles, accounting for 5,931 incidents. Single-vehicle crashes were also common, with 2,589 incidents, making up 29.0% of the total. The data also includes several multi-vehicle pile-ups, including one 10-vehicle crash and one 9-vehicle crash.
Vehicles Per Crash
"Other" combines 2 smaller categories (2 records): 10 (1), 9 (1).
Source: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv Open Data · 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31 · Crash-level records
Data Sources & Methodology
Primary Data Source
All crash data in this report is sourced from Connecticut Crash Data, accessed programmatically via the Csv Open Data API (SODA). This dataset contains official police-reported motor vehicle traffic crash records maintained by the reporting jurisdiction's law enforcement agency. Records are published to the open data portal by the municipality and are subject to the portal's terms of use.
Data Retrieval
- Access method: Csv Open Data API (SoQL queries)
- Data format: Structured JSON via REST API
- Record types queried: Crash events, person records, and vehicle unit records
- Date filter applied: 2015-01-01 through 2015-01-31
- Report generated: August 20, 2026
Data Coverage
- Reporting period: 2015-01-01 through 2015-01-31 (31 days)
- Geographic scope: connecticut, CT
- Total crash records analyzed: 8,938
- Total persons involved: 20,365
- Total vehicles involved: 15,823
Analytical Methodology
- Severity classification: Uses the KABCO injury scale (K=Fatal, A=Incapacitating injury, B=Non-incapacitating injury, C=Possible injury, O=No injury/property damage only), the standard classification in U.S. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC). Severity is assigned per crash event based on the most severe injury in that crash. A single fatal crash (K) may involve multiple fatalities; therefore the "Persons Killed" count in the headline KPIs may differ from the "Fatal" crash count in the severity breakdown.
- Contributing factors: Reflect the officer-determined primary contributory cause recorded at the time of the crash report. These are preliminary determinations and may not reflect final investigation findings.
- Hit-and-run classification: Based on the hit-and-run indicator field in the official crash report, as determined by the responding officer at the scene.
- Temporal analysis: Day-of-week and hour-of-day distributions are computed from the crash date/time timestamp in each record.
- Demographics: Age and sex distributions are drawn from person-level records linked to each crash event. A single crash may involve multiple persons.
- Vehicle data: Make information is drawn from vehicle unit records linked to each crash event.
- AI commentary: Narrative sections are generated by Google Gemini (large language model) based on the structured data. Commentary is descriptive, not predictive, and should not be interpreted as expert opinion.
Limitations & Disclaimers
- Only crashes reported to and documented by law enforcement are included. Minor incidents, unreported crashes, and near-misses are not captured in this dataset.
- Data reflects conditions at the time of the initial police report and may be subject to subsequent corrections, reclassifications, or supplements by the reporting agency.
- Open data portal records may experience a publication lag - recently occurring crashes may not yet appear in the dataset at the time of report generation.
- AI-generated commentary is produced by a large language model and is intended to highlight patterns in the data. It does not constitute legal, medical, or professional analysis.
- Percentages are calculated from reported data and are subject to rounding.
Non-Affiliation Disclosure
This report is produced independently by ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in partnership with any law enforcement agency, municipal government, state department of transportation, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data is sourced from publicly available government open data portals.
Data License
The underlying crash data is provided under the municipality's Open Data Terms of Use and is made available to the public for unrestricted use. This analysis and report is © 2026 Injuria.ai and may be cited with attribution using the suggested citation below.
Corrections & Feedback
If you believe any data in this report is inaccurate or have questions about our methodology, please contact: data@injuria.ai. We are committed to accuracy and will issue corrections promptly.
Suggested Citation
ThatCarHitMe.com (Injuria.ai). "connecticut, CT Crash Intelligence Report: January 2015." Published August 20, 2026. Reporting period: 2015-01-01 to 2015-01-31. Data source: Connecticut Crash Data, Csv Open Data. Available at: https://thatcarhitme.com/crash-data/connecticut/statewide/january-2015-report
About the Publisher
ThatCarHitMe.com is a crash data intelligence platform developed by Injuria.ai, a legal technology company specializing in traffic safety analytics. We aggregate and analyze publicly available government crash data to produce structured intelligence reports for communities, researchers, journalists, and legal professionals. Our reports combine programmatic data retrieval from official open data portals with AI-assisted narrative analysis.
Questions about this report's data or methodology: data@injuria.ai
ThatCarHitMe.com · An Injuria.ai Company
ThatCarHitMe.com
An Injuria.ai Company
Crash Data Intelligence
Data: Connecticut Crash Data · Csv
Period: 2015-01-01 – 2015-01-31
Generated: August 20, 2026 · All rights reserved
The data is step one. Get a Connecticut attorney on the line.
Call our intake team. We connect you to a vetted Connecticut personal injury attorney who calls you back within minutes. No phone tag. No voicemails.
Always free for accident victims.