Trieweiler Law Firm
P.O. Box 5509, Whitefish, MT 59937, Whitefish, MT 59937
About Trieweiler Law Firm
Trieweiler Law Firm is a Montana-based practice with an office in Whitefish. The firm handles personal injury cases, including professional liability, product liability, Federal Employers Liability Act, and workplace injuries. Attorney Terry N. Trieweiler served on the Montana Supreme Court for over 12 years, authoring more than 1,200 opinions. He has 50 years of legal experience and is a certified specialist in civil trial advocacy. The firm has secured notable results, including a $3.2 million product liability verdict.
Notable Case Results
Case results are sourced directly from attorney websites by Injuria.ai's data infrastructure, which actively monitors 22,000+ personal injury law firms. They are not results obtained by ThatCarHitMe.com. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
$1.6M
Workplace Injury
Pat Cheff, a conductor for BNSF, slipped and fell while at work in the rail yard and injured his back. Following settlement of his claim for $300,000, he learned that due to a pre-existing spinal condition, he was not a candidate for corrective surgery. This action was to set aside the previous settlement and recover the full measure of his damages. The settlement was set aside. The jury awarded $1.6 million, reduced by 15 percent for contributory fault, and the judgment was affirmed on appeal.
$3.2M
Product Liability
While being treated for lymphoma, Peggy Stevens was administered Zometa, a bisphosphonate manufactured by Novartis, and administered intravenously to prevent bone fractures. Following a tooth extraction while being treated with Zometa, Ms. Stevens developed osteonecrosis of the jaw, a potential complication about which she had not been warned. This action against Novartis for failure to adequately warn resulted. Following a verdict for Ms. Stevens in the amount of $3.2 million, the first in the country against Novartis, although hundreds of previous cases had been filed, the defendant appealed, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed, and in the process followed the modern trend regarding a pharmaceutical manufacturer’s duty to warn was not limited to the prescribing physician but was owed equally to the patient.
$450,000
Discrimination
Following trial before the Department of Labor, the Hearing Examiner found that BNSF had discriminated against Cringle when it denied him employment based solely on his height and weight ratio and awarded $400,000 in damages. $50,000 was added to the award by the District Court for costs and fees. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the judgment was affirmed for failure to meet the statutory deadline for appealing the Department’s decision to the Human Rights Commission.
$320,000
Discrimination
Following trial before the Montana Department of Labor & Industry, the Hearing Examiner found that BNSF had discriminated against Charles Bilbruck by denying him employment based on its perception that he was disabled due to extreme obesity. It awarded him $250,000, which was increased to $320,000 by the District Court after inclusion of attorney fees and costs. Following BNSF’s appeal of the damage calculations, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed judgment in favor of Mr. Bilbruck.
$366,000
Discrimination
Following trial before the Montana Dept. of Labor & Industry, the Hearing Examiner found that BNSF had illegally discriminated against Matt O’Dea under the Montana Human Rights Act by refusing to hire him because of a perceived disability based on his obesity. He was awarded $366,000, which was increased by his costs and attorney fees on appeal to the District Court. BNSF sought a stay of the state court appeal pending its efforts to have the case removed to federal court. That motion was denied in District Court and the denial was affirmed on appeal and judgment of O’Dea affirmed.
$75,000
Medical Malpractice
Survivor brought medical malpractice wrongful death and survivor claims against surgeon and others. Jury returned verdict of $75,000 on wrongful death claim and nothing on survivor claim and survivor's motion for new trial was granted by the District Court of the First Judicial District, County of Lewis & Clark, Gordon Bennett, J., and surgeon appealed. The Supreme Court, Joel G. Roth, District Judge, held that: (1) survivor had right to new trial on ground that jury verdict awarding $75,000 for wrongful death and nothing for survival was inconsistent, and (2) surgeon was negligent per se and liable for patient's injury and death caused by surgical sponge that was left in patient's body prior to closing incision, where surgical nurse's failure to inform surgeon of unaccounted-for sponge and radiologist's failure to detect sponge in postsurgical x-rays were substantial factors in bringing about patient's injury and death. Affirmed and remanded.
Contact Information
Office Locations
Top Rated Personal Injury Law Firms in Whitefish, MT
Compare firms ranked by Google Reviews.
View Top Rated FirmsDo you represent Trieweiler Law Firm?